Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado GOP to have CAUCUS instead of primary if Trump ballot decision stands
justthenews.com ^ | 20 DEC 2023 | Madeleine Hubbard

Posted on 12/20/2023 3:30:28 PM PST by Chad C. Mulligan

The Colorado Republican Party said it would start using a caucus system rather than participating in a primary election if the state supreme court's decision banning former President Donald Trump from the primary ballot remains in place.

After GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy said Tuesday evening on X, formerly Twitter, that he would withdraw from Colorado's primary ballot if Trump is not allowed on, the state Republican Party responded: "You won't have to because we will withdraw from the Primary as a Party and convert to a pure caucus system if this is allowed to stand."

Trump vowed to appeal the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to the U.S. Supreme Court after the state judges ruled that Trump is ineligible to run for the White House for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol Riot under the 14th Amendment's insurrection clause.

"We think this is an absurd ruling and we're going to do whatever we can to protect the rights of voters in Colorado and frankly across the nation and choose Donald Trump, if they so choose," Colorado Republican Party Chair Dave Williams told CNN after the court's decision.

"We're going to appeal this to the United States Supreme Court. We're a party to the case and we're not going to take this lying down. And if need be, we're going to withdraw from the primary and go to a strict caucus process that would allow our voters to choose Donald Trump if they want," he also said.

Follow Madeleine Hubbard on X or Instagram.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: caucus; colorado; gop; primary; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Every state Rupublican party should do this. Correct me if I'm wrong, but would it not put and end to Democrats picking our candidates by crossover voting in primaries?
1 posted on 12/20/2023 3:30:28 PM PST by Chad C. Mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chad C. Mulligan

Can the state choose to ignore the results of a caucus?


2 posted on 12/20/2023 3:31:41 PM PST by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad C. Mulligan

And what happens WHEN the Democrats issue a court order banning Trump from the caucus process? What then?


3 posted on 12/20/2023 3:33:14 PM PST by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad C. Mulligan

Assuming this would be allowed, and I’m not convinced, aren’t we just relying on the national GOP to determine who would receive primary votes from Colorado?


4 posted on 12/20/2023 3:33:19 PM PST by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad C. Mulligan

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12886511/colorado-court-trump-alan-dershowtitz.html


5 posted on 12/20/2023 3:36:45 PM PST by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

HELP, HOPE, PRAY or find some way to keep FR funded
6 posted on 12/20/2023 3:37:22 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chad C. Mulligan

Megadittos to that.


7 posted on 12/20/2023 3:37:58 PM PST by rfp1234 (E Porcibus Unum )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad C. Mulligan

Of course, it would have to be THIS brand of CAULK-US.

8 posted on 12/20/2023 3:38:17 PM PST by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

Assuming this would be allowed“

Allowed by whom? Your second point is what l was thinking. The GOPe is a bunch of never Trumper a-holes. Wouldn’t switching to caucuses put the decision with same base hating bastards who gave us Ronna as party head?


9 posted on 12/20/2023 3:38:34 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

As opposed to the Colorado Democrats?


10 posted on 12/20/2023 3:39:08 PM PST by azsportsterman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

If the Republicans switch to a caucus in CO, CO will make up a reason to keep Trump off of the general ballot.


11 posted on 12/20/2023 3:45:46 PM PST by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

Barring him from a primary is one thing - those are wholly controlled by the state - barring him from the general, without a conviction, is in direct violation of federal law.

Before this whole primary nonsense, you had to belong to the party AND be an active member to select a candidate who would run for the party in the “only” election. That’s why the DNC keeps breaking their own internal rules about who gets to run (like Bernie in the last primary) because these are private orgs and they can pick and choose their candidate and ignore the primaries altogether. It makes the party distrustful but hey, it works doesn’t it?

The general elections are the ones guarded by federal and constitutional protections.


12 posted on 12/20/2023 3:52:55 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy
Allowed by whom? Your second point is what l was thinking. The GOPe is a bunch of never Trumper a-holes. Wouldn’t switching to caucuses put the decision with same base hating bastards who gave us Ronna as party head?

That's not how a caucus works. Any and all grassroots Republicans can attend the caucus, and the results would be binding on the state party. Someone from Iowa please chime in here.

13 posted on 12/20/2023 3:55:21 PM PST by Chad C. Mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

I live in a caucus state. I can’t see how that would work. The caucus system is very informal and individualistic, a perhaps a bit chaotic. I think what the GOP should do is choose a slate of electors’ names rather than put Trump’s name on the ballot. After all, that is who we are actually voting for.


14 posted on 12/20/2023 3:55:45 PM PST by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Skywise

“ The general elections are the ones guarded by federal and constitutional protections.”
******************************************************

I’m pretty sure primary elections fall under constitutional law also. My concern is that by making it a caucus, the Colorado Republicans have given the Roberts court an excuse (IT’S MUTE) to not look at this now allowing other states to engage in further mischief in 2024.


15 posted on 12/20/2023 3:59:32 PM PST by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA. -PRO-MAX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
Can the state choose to ignore the results of a caucus?

No. the state merely administers the primary election for the parties if that is the method chosen for selecting the delegates to the National convention. Parties are not required to have primaries or even caucuses to select the delegates. The smaller parties like the Green Party, Peace and Freedom, etc. just have a national convention but don't have primaries or caucuses.

16 posted on 12/20/2023 4:05:40 PM PST by CA Conservative (Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

They’re regulated (somewhat) through federal law but there’s nothing about them in the constitution - only how the general operates. Primaries evolved as a way of selecting candidates to open up selection to the general public when itused to be tightly held by political bosses who picked favored winners to run.


17 posted on 12/20/2023 4:06:22 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

While the state has a role in administering a primary - printing ballots, counting votes, etc. - they have no role in a caucus. That is run by the party itself and the state has no say.


18 posted on 12/20/2023 4:07:25 PM PST by CA Conservative (Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

“If the Republicans switch to a caucus in CO, CO will make up a reason to keep Trump off of the general ballot.”

I think the CO SOS said even write-ins would not be allowed.


19 posted on 12/20/2023 4:09:15 PM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

As always, it’s what is in the Constitution plus case law that has been decided in the past. Here is a brief summary:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/election-laws

Generally the states are given a pretty free hand as to how to run their elections (which Democrats took advantage of in 2020). Thus, mail-in ballots, etc were permitted under the constitution.

The main reason states have been limited is when first amendment rights are at risk, and it seems to me the Colorado ban is a prima facia case that those who want to vote for Trump are being denied the opportunity to do so. I’m not a lawyer but I’ll bet that is part of the challenge that will put an end to this.


20 posted on 12/20/2023 4:17:10 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson