Posted on 12/15/2023 5:34:16 AM PST by Red Badger
c’mon man... it’s not against the law to loan relatives money... especially those that need to have the latest and greatest escorts./ sarc
WHy is no one asking the question:
IF THESE ARE ‘LOANS’, WHERE DID JOE BIDEN GET THE MONEY TO LOAN TO THEM ON A SENATOR’S SALARY AND OWN ALL THESE VERY EXPENSIVE HOMES? they should have been on his financial disclosure statements............................
c’mon man... everyone knows the biden business model is legit.
no one bucks with a fiden... no one.
things take too long to bring corruption to justice...
if only we had some one who is willing to clean up this mess.
“People think that a liar gains a victory over his victim. What I’ve learned is that a lie is an act of self-abdication, because one surrenders one’s reality to the person to whom one lies, making that person one’s master, condemning oneself from then on to faking the sort of reality that person’s view requires to be faked…The man who lies to the world, is the world’s slave from then on…There are no white lies, there is only the blackest of destruction, and a white lie is the blackest of all.”
― Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
c’mon man, quoting ayn rand is like saying she’s responsible for giving these government shiites the playbook... only this time it’ll be successful...
good quote actually.
t
That’s quite a lot of dough to have on hand for the purposes of lending out given his 230K government salary, which must have been really stretched to the limit considering the mortgages, taxes, and upkeep on all those mansions.
Mr Ziegler was asked: “the Biden admin has attempted to characterize 100’s of thousands of dollars that exchanged hands between Biden family members – specific payments to Joe Biden – as stemming from “loans” and “loan repayments.”
Ziegler was asked by House Ways and Means Committee chair: “ In your investigation of Hunter Biden, did you uncover any evidence that would prove or show these payments to Biden marked “loans”, were in fact, loans or loan repayments?”
Ziegler replies: “In all the scenarios – Burisma, CEFC, all the financial scenarios which involved the Bidens– there was nothing to verify that there were “loans” or “repayments” in the evidence.”
Legitimate loans also include (a) terms of the loan, (b) a dedicated repayment
schedule, and, (c) concrete evidence of the expected interest attached to the loan.
A legit lender would also specify a time period when he/she could be expected to be repaid.
If you asked most people about ‘loans-to-relatives’....maybe three-quarters of them will say as long as it was $10k or less....no paperwork. Going beyond $10k...a fair number of people would say no to the loan to a relative.
From my military years, I’d say a fair amount of relative loans that people conducted...were never paid back.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
― Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead
The only ‘proof’ here is the BS remarks notes on the checks - ‘loan repayment.’ Illicit money flying back and forth here like it was Christmas candy or something. It all works(worked) while Joe was in the WH because he controlled the agencies involved with oversight.
In a way, the Biden family is worse than the Clinton family. The Clintons played fast and loose with donated money to their foundation. The Bidens did (are doing) it with BRIBE money.
Has anyone asked Brandon about any of this?
Change the names to Donald Trump and Donald trump Jr and tell me if the results and reactions would be the same
Peter Doocey tried.....................
The Clintons took bribe money as well, it was just in the form of donations to their foundation....................
wanna bet there’s more than a few “loans” to “critical” US Govt employees...some of whom may or may not “work” in the eye are sss
Joe sure did loan a lot of money to people who were making more money than he was.
EC
Paying loan payments for non-loans sounds unlawful?
The answer is:
1. Comer and the republicans are too stupid to ask the question.
2. The question will be asked later into the inquiry.
3. The republicans will intentionally not ask the question because they are not serious about impeaching Biden. We are watching Gowdy Kabuki theater.
I pick #3.
My favorite chapter, the "Concerto of Deliverance', remains my favorite chapter. Hank Rearden tells his mooching family members they're on their own.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.