Harvard University Anti-Bullying Policy (calling for the genocide of Jews IS a Policy violation - it does NOT depend upon “context”)

Harvard ^ | September 1, 2023 | N/A

[DoodleBob]

II. Definitions

A. Definition of Bullying

Bullying, used as a shorthand for hostile and abusive behavior or power-based harassment, is defined here as harmful interpersonal aggression by words or actions that humiliate, degrade, demean, intimidate, or threaten2 an individual or individuals. For a violation of the Policy to occur, such aggression must be sufficiently severe or pervasive, and objectively offensive, that it creates a work, educational, or living environment that a reasonable person would consider intimidating, hostile, or abusive and denies the individual an equal opportunity to participate in the benefits of the workplace or the institution’s programs and activities. Unless sufficiently severe or pervasive, a single act typically would not constitute bullying.

…this Policy recognizes that bullying may also occur between community members in the same role, or of the same rank or status.

Bullying may include, but is not limited to, the following behaviors:

• Abusive expression directed at an individual or individuals, such as derogatory remarks, epithets, or ad hominem attacks that are outside the range of commonly accepted expressions of disagreement, disapproval, or critique in an academic community and professional setting that respects free expression. The Policy encompasses abusive expression or ad hominem attacks that are verbal or nonverbal, spoken or written, recorded, visual, or digital, including content posted to online platforms, academic tools, or social media sites. Examples include:

…

o Malicious comments about a person’s appearance, lifestyle, family, or culture.

• Unwarranted physical contact or intimidating gestures directed at an individual or individuals. Examples include:

o A physical, verbal, or written act toward another person, which causes them reasonably to fear for their safety or the safety of others.

o Invading personal space after being asked to move or step away.

[Liz]

......all of the above........and more.....

[LS]

Well, yes. This is the inevitable direction. But ultimately it comes down to a victim ladder. Jews have now moved way down, behind transoids #1, homosexuals/lesbos #2, blacks #3 (but elevate any combo above), Hispanics #4, all illegals #5, Hamas #6, then Jews.