Posted on 11/30/2023 1:20:26 PM PST by 4Runner
Trump on Wednesday attacked Dawn Engoron, the wife of the judge, Arthur Engoron, and the judge’s clerk, on his social media platform Truth Social.
He called Dawn Engoron a “Trump hating wife” and said that she and Arthur Engoron’s law clerk had “taken over control of the New York State Witch Hunt Trial aimed at me, my family, and the Republican Party”.
On Thursday, the gag order against him, which had been paused two weeks ago, was reinstated, but it did not stop Trump lashing out further. The order only specifies comments about members of Judge Engoron’s staff, not his family.
Trump posted screenshots of vulgar and profane anti-Trump messages on X, formerly known as Twitter, purported to have been made by Dawn Engoron – prompting her swiftly to assert that she does not have an account.
(Excerpt) Read more at aol.com ...
TRUTH
As if this is a normal case being prosecuted during normal times?
I got one for you. You don't prosecute somebody for political reasons when there is no legitimate case.
“.....sadly, I have to agree....he would be a far, far better President than that senile PoS Biden, but if nominated, Trump won’t win...other web sites - conservative at that - note that well over half of all voters deeply despise Trump and would likely walk barefooted over hot coals to vote for whomever percolates to the top on the Democrat (NOT “Democratic”) party ticket....jus’ sayin’ ....”
Over half of voters don’t like Trump (somewhere around 60% according to one poll). But I’ve seen a poll that over half of voters also don’t like Biden (around 53%). If you add both percentages it would be over 100%, which isn’t possible. What will happen is that there will be a significant percentage (maybe as high as 10%) who don’t vote for Trump or Biden.
Hey newbie boy, I suggest you go to hell. Twice if you can manage it. Keep on trashing the OP on these threads and see how fast you get a reputation, and it won't be the one you think you deserve.
Not words.
Who used the word “attack”? Why are you addressing your comment to me?
Talk about a response that doesn't "help" ones "case in any way".
It makes no difference what he says about the prosecutor.
Obviously the guy was referring to the use of the word "attack" in the title and wasn't addressing you personally.
I could see a "newbie" making that mistake.
Bingo!
She had her Youtube channel scrubbed with professional help.
It must have been a doozie.
Have you seen the content she’s posted publicly on social media? Even if the judge was impartial, which is he is not, he should be obligated to recuse himself.
They are not following the rules or the law, so is Trump supposed to just go by the book?!
If he didn’t talk about the posts made by the biased judge’s psychotic wife the media wouldn’t mention them.
Fortunately, he hasn’t hired you as an advisor.
You are,correct the guardian is A LEFT WING RAG.
So you’re saying just bend over and spread em?
As all these corrupt lying legal people have decided to convict before the trial ever started, how can it do any harm?
Perhaps if he pisses them off enough, they will do something very stupid. He's got nothing to lose. This judge is out of control and needs to have his @$$ beat.
Yes, he speaks truth to power, which lesser men are afraid to do.
She's a nasty piece of work and heavily influential on the judge, so I don't know why she should get a free ride.
This is war.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.