Pure liberal fascism.
p
Totally exculpatory, but then again so is everything related to this kangaroo court case.
What did her office say? The response doesnt seem to be part of the excerpt. Or did I miss their reply?
She’ll get her conviction.Why? New York.
Being an insult to honest, hard-working blacks, stupid, insane, fat and corrupt is the right qualification for being a NEW YORK judge.
This is the most outrageous and ridiculous case. There are no victims, no complainants, except for an intrusive DOJ . How do they live with themselves?
“Kise also argued that the German bank wasn’t harmed because it “didn’t change what it did based on what President Trump submitted.”
is seeking $250 million in ‘damages’ when there is no victim in this fraud case>>> Sorry but when we allow the courts to declare corps and states as people then they can be defrauded.
This is very bad news for boring DeSantis and Neocon queen Haley.
So, what was her response?
Next she sues Deutsch Bank for exploiting the People and enabling capitalist criminals like Trump. DOWN WITH KULAKS!
The pickaninny doesn’t care.
Her Andrew Weissmann types are going to get Trump any day now.
Yeah right, LOL.
These are show trials for Trump haters, Trump haters that are very confused at why things aren’t moving faster.
“The wheels of justice grind slowly.”(sarcasm)
Pure liberal fascism.
“ Kise also argued that the German bank wasn’t harmed because it “didn’t change what it did based on what President Trump submitted”
He was not president at the time. Wording it as Kise did makes it seem Trump did during presidency.
quote :
“It’s just a difference of opinion,” Williams said, according to Bloomberg.
Trump’s defense attorney argued that Deutsche Bank conducted its own due diligence and made their own decision to loan Trump money.
“The bank conducted its own due diligence. The bank had no problem with a $2 billion or a $3 billion difference,” Trump’s attorney Christopher Kise said.
Kise also argued that the German bank wasn’t harmed because it “didn’t change what it did based on what President Trump submitted.”
Almost EXACTLY what I have been saying from the start about this!
James is nothing but an AA hire.....but she’s PURE EVIL!
I’m waiting for Justice Arthur Engoron to just announce “that’s it, I heard enough, Trump your guilty, bailiff arrest Trump” Engorge (spell check suggests 🤣) turns towards his ‘law clerk’ and says “come on baby, call up your boyfriend Chuck Schumer, let’s get a drink and talk about that threesome….. I’ll let you feel my muscles…”
Used to be a lender. Typically I would review the notes to a financial statement before looking at the numbers. Based on note review, I would discount or eliminate certain assets. Some line items were routinely omitted unless there was a compelling reason to include them. It was always the bank’s responsibility to perform due diligence. To me this trial is a prime example of “Political Persecution For Dummies”.
She needs to be thrown out on her fat black a##. She has done nothing to serve the people
Let me guess, in the next 6 months we will see a story about New York discontinuing involving Deutsche Bank in some program involving the city.