Posted on 11/28/2023 4:04:21 AM PST by PJ-Comix
BOMBSHELL video evidence of bias and misconduct of Justice Engoron’s Law Clerk, Allison Greenfield, just uncovered. MISTRIAL INCOMING!!!
While attending an October 2022 Democrat Fundraiser, Greenfield can be heard saying Biden is the “best President in the history of the United… pic.twitter.com/EIvS8TdNkE— Judicial Protest (@JudicialProtest) November 6, 2023
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
What did you expect? Keep in mind, you gave me no choice but to defend my point. You chased me down first, I didn’t chase you.
Look... We are on the same side here. I have eleven Grandchildren I love very much and am doing what I can to save their future. And others are screwing it up by not using their heads. It drives me crazy when they do things wrong that causes set backs in our cause and goal. Grasping at straws like they do makes us all look foolish and is one of those setbacks. We are not doing ourselves any favors with stuff like that. We need to get serious and stay on the intelligent track. We need to hit them with everything we can but it needs to be substantial and powerful enough to truly do some good.
I still haven’t heard a good reason we should actively cover up Judge Engoron’s political bias and impaired judgment.
Engoron is the trial judge for the nonsensical charges against Trump.
If we try to cover up the judge’s political bias against Trump, then there’s more likelihood Engoron’s impaired judgment will have an effect on our country.
“I still haven’t heard a good reason we should actively cover up Judge Engoron’s political bias”
Of course not. Was this Judge Engoron?
Judge Engoron’s law clerk Allison Greenfield is possibly as much of a political hack as the judge himself, but the judge is the one calling the shots in the case.
If we censor ourselves in holding him accountable, then we’ve succumbed to the low IQ propaganda.
I should clarify something.
Yes, it would be stupid for patriots to withhold commentary about Judge Engoron’s political bias.
But even stupider is when communists and other globalists try to impose censorship on us. What I mean is, when they think they should censor us or anyone else, they’re acting on low IQ.
“If we censor ourselves in holding him accountable.”
You obviously completely firewalled the point I was making.
In no way am I saying we should censorship REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. Especially against the judge.
This is NOT him, And this clerk is just a democrat being a normal democrat. She never even mentioned Trump’s name in bias or liable, if she had it would be a whole different ballgame. Is just being a Republican court clerk legal grounds for dismissal against a Democrat defendant? Of course not. it would be silly to say so.
It is grasping at straws to claim bias just because she happens to be a normal democrat doing normal democrat stuff and she put a democrat on a pedestal instead of a Republican.
She should not even even be a democrat because she works for the judge??? And because she is a democrat she chooses Biden to put on a pedestal instead of Trump she is biased??? Was she supposed to say Trump was the best President ever to avoid being biased? Why would she?
See what I am getting at here? To think this is silly and grasping at straws. If the left grasped at straws like this against a Republican court clerk would it be a dismissal Bombshell?
Of course not... Because either way it would still be a nothing burger that a court clerk happens to belong to a political party and supports their party. It is not even worthy of a second glance on the way to go find >some real and true< meat to hold against them that “might actually prove true bias”.
There is plenty of REAL evidence out there to pin on the judge and clerk, but this particular article event is not it. It won’t even raised an eyebrow in the legal community.
It makes no sense to pretend we’re separating truth from politics when politics has saturated the entire system.
Why would we look to the legal community for guidance? They don’t use standards of law!
The argument against politicizing a legal system is one of the easiest arguments to make, in all of human history.
The failure by communists to understand this concept is, more than anything else, a mark of low IQ.
I don’t characterize communism as low IQ as a personal attack against communists. It’s simply an observation of objective truth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.