The “mainstream” view continues to be “Show me rock-solid irrefutable proof that the 2020 election was stolen and — if you show me real proof — THEN we can begin an investigation.”
But, of course, normally, all one has to do is raise a number of “odd” occurrences and then ask, “Shouldn’t we investigate that?” And Lord knows there are plenty of oddities about 2020. But, the “mainstream” view is that everything is automatically debunked until such time as solid proof is verified, which means no one needs to investigate. Just wait for “proof” to magically appear.
Biden got more votes that Obamao. Ha ha.
The fact that the election was a banana republic election is sufficient grounds to question it.
It became fairly clear early on after the election that one could not prove that Trump won enough votes in enough states to win the election. At the same time, it was also clear that if forced to, it could not be proven that Biden won either. The protracted campaign to compromise, eliminate, and negate security measures and features made many states a complete mess.
Then there are the abuses upon the campaign.
I’ve wondered why nothing came of this:
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/jovan-pulitzer-june-27th-arizona-forensic-testimony/