Posted on 11/18/2023 9:46:42 AM PST by spirited irish
During Saturday’s Ultimate Fighting Championship 295 event in New York City, former President Donald Trump — accompanied by Kid Rock, Tucker Carlson and UFC President and CEO Dana White — made an iconic entrance into Madison Square Garden.
Comedian, podcaster and longtime UFC color commentator Joe Rogan described the scene as reminiscent of a superhero film.
“He walks out to Kid Rock’s ‘American Badass’ with Kid Rock and Tucker Carlson, walking in like the right-wing Avengers, and the place went nuts,” Rogan said Thursday on his podcast, “The Joe Rogan Experience.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
How were the chicks and did you learn how to ski?
You are the the one challenging me, saying I could not produce ONE example of what I said. I provided you with several examples just for sampling. So far, I don’t think you know what you are talking about.
YOU need to offer a reasonable and supportable argument where those things are authorised by the Constitution.
It is up to YOU to show that YOU know and understand the presumptions, text, and structure of the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended.
Bud Light has learned a VERY HARD lesson, they are honestly trying to return to its roots!! WE ALL make mistakes in life and believe me Bud took one in the butt hard (no pun intended)! It is time we gave them a break, if Kid Rock, Trump and AMA can give them a break so can we!! It is going to be a VERY ROUGH ROAD back for them MOST people have changed brands and like what they changed to!!
Those are a list of things with no apparent no noted connection to Trump or tge constitution
And you know it. You’re wasting my time
Correction in above post UFC not AMA!!!
“ YOU need to offer a reasonable and supportable argument where those things are authorised by the Constitution.
It is up to YOU to show that YOU know and understand the presumptions, text, and structure of the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended.”
Neither case is correct
YOU are wasting MY time. It is obvious you haven’t read nor understand the Constitution and yet you challenge my constitution-based comment. How stupid.
Away with you.
‘You’re stupid’ is not not normally a compelling argument. Certainly not in this case.
What do you call challenging a statement based on the Constitution when the challenger hasn’t even read, much less understand the Constitution? Seems like “stupid” fits pretty well.
You are correct but I doubt he thinks that far.
I’m not challenging a constitutional argument at all. You never asserted a constitutional argument
You asserted on a non legal common forum that Trump subverts he constitution
You can provide a convincing statement fitting for a common forum or ba called out as falsely accusing him
That’s all
I’m just saying calling me stupid is not the proof or argument we’re looking for
“ You are correct but I doubt he thinks that far.”
Maybe you can assist. How exactly is he correct?
You: There is no way you can cite even one example
Me; Try these on for size, none of which is authorized by the Constitution. “Good” unconstitutional acts. But unconstitutional acts of the feds are still the wrong thing and there is really no way to do the wrong thing the right way...
From there I cited a number of examples with which you didn't know what to do and basically went off the rails.
My argument IS constitutionally based and you DID challenge it.
Next.
“Trump has gotten most things done by basically dictating, most of which is unconstitutional.”
That’s is not true
That is no argument.
You're going from pillar to post changing your assertions about a subject you apparently know nothing about.
Please just go away.
I am not arguing. I’m stating your statement is not true
Period. It’s a ridiculous statement
If you would like an argument here’s one-
If Trump had done anything illegal/unconstitutional the people bringing him up on hundreds of charges as Fido as yours, defeated continuously, would have brought him up on charges of acting unconstitutionally. But they haven’t.
Therefore he has not done anything, much lest most thing, as you have accused, unconstitutional
Any proof he’s correct?
Any comment on why people working tirelessly to bring trump up on a charge yet to stick have not brought him up on charges of acting unconstitutionally?
In 1964, Barry Goldwater closed his Presidential campaign with a late evening rally in Madison Square Garden.
The crowd inside was Standing Room Only.
At least 10,000 more stood outside, on a chilly night, listening to Goldwater speak through PA speakers.
I went to bed that night 100% convinced that Goldwater had turned around the election and would win the next day.
Whoops - Goldwater lost New York state by almost 40%.
No, they didn't fire high enough people fast enough. Examples need to be made in Belgium as well as the US, and need to reach at least the head of Diversity, although changes need to be made as high as the C-Suite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.