You are the the one challenging me, saying I could not produce ONE example of what I said. I provided you with several examples just for sampling. So far, I don’t think you know what you are talking about.
YOU need to offer a reasonable and supportable argument where those things are authorised by the Constitution.
It is up to YOU to show that YOU know and understand the presumptions, text, and structure of the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended.
Those are a list of things with no apparent no noted connection to Trump or tge constitution
And you know it. You’re wasting my time
“ YOU need to offer a reasonable and supportable argument where those things are authorised by the Constitution.
It is up to YOU to show that YOU know and understand the presumptions, text, and structure of the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended.”
Neither case is correct