Posted on 11/12/2023 1:38:24 AM PST by knighthawk
Like many teenagers, 15-year-old Arnaq took a part-time job in a local shop to earn some money. Appallingly, though, the store manager sexually assaulted her six times over the next two years – and then she became pregnant.
Then, chillingly, after she had an abortion, doctors secretly inserted a contraceptive coil as part of a brutal, state-organised campaign by the Danish government to control the population in Greenland, its former colony.
The device, also known as an IUD, remained inside her for five years until it was discovered when – mystified by her inability to become pregnant – she went to see a doctor in 2002. Then, after its removal, she found to her horror that she could no longer have children due to damaged internal organs.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Anyone for free “National Healthcare”?
All of the Medicare is untouchable crowd have already ruined our healthcare system that just keeps people sick. CMS even rules your paid for employee health plan.
Denmark has had a long-standing policy going back at least to before the Second World War of sterilizing unmarried females who give birth then apply for welfare. Harsh, but the consequences may be avoided by either marrying the father of the child, or by becoming self-supporting and not needing the welfare payments.
I am aware of this because first wife Aase was a Danish citizen, and this was enacted upon two of her sisters, who in addition to being sterilized, had the children taken away and put in foster care.
The money for supporting all the Middle Eastern male immigrants has to come from somewhere.
Interesting. It is a rational policy. In less enlightened times, a woman who became pregnant without a means of support would often starve.
[Anyone for free “National Healthcare”?]
ObamaScare.GloveOfTyranny
“Sometime’s granny needs to take a pill.”
And people still voted for that.
They also should clip any guy who rapes a girl like in the article.
She should have quit the first time she was assaulted.
p
So which is worse? Hard to say.
Health-careless...the doctor will see you in 6 months...🤓
Around here, sex with a 15-year-old is against the law, statutory rape. If DNA shows him as the father, he should be faced with a choice - pay support or go to jail. Maybe both.
No family support either? Where's her dad?
Parents won't pay, Baby daddy won't pay, why should gov't pay?
Maybe she should be sterilized.
Guess my kin folk saw this coming and left for here back in 1630ish. 😳😁👍
🙏🇺🇸🇮🇱👍
And I’m forced to see them every 6 months, as they want blood work. It’s taken 4 years for some Physio, which won’t fix the Degenerative spine, from script meds. Gastro wants an upper Endoscope every yrs, as that is all Medicare/Tricare Life covers. Barrett’s Esophagus, a Pre-Cancer they won’t remove.
This is a question the entire planet will eventually have to face.
I’m not one who believes we’re anywhere near that time yet. I did the math. If every human alive on earth today — all 8 billion of them — lived in the state of Texas, they could all live in 5-person single story, single family homes of 2000 sq ft with enough space left for a 2-car garage. Wouldn’t even need any hi-rises.
And with all 8 billion living in Texas, it’s population density still would be less than the 50 most densely populated cities on earth today. So it would be absurd to suggest we couldn’t provide for the nutritional needs of well more than 8 billion if we had the totality of the six inhabited continents (except for Texas’s 269,000 square miles) for farming. And adequate water is as simple as getting our heads out of our collective butts and switching primarily to nuclear power generation (which makes desalination of seawater more economical).
But the fact remains that if we continue to have unlimited population growth, it is inevitable that eventually the shortage of resources will lead to war. So if at some point we collectively don’t take steps to decide who can have children, and how many, and devise sway to enforce that limit, and, who knows, it might not happen for another 100,000 years, but the problem will self-correct. Through warfare.
So the question becomes, which is the more likely to cause the extermination of our species, the cultural and societal impacts of a planet-wide program of what essentially will be eugenics, or the existential risk of a war without end.
The pro choice mob are all in for it they want it it to be a constitutional right.
They enjoy the thrill of the kill
Meanwhile, here in the US, children are being sterilized and having their breasts and genitals amputated and it is called “gender affirming care”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.