To: ChildOfThe60s
I saw nothing in the article that indicated Crowder exposed to (sic)source Crowder stated that it was a “Nashville detective.” I highlighted in my original post.
17 posted on
11/09/2023 9:32:57 AM PST by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
To: thegagline
Crowder stated that it was a “Nashville detective.” I highlighted in my original post.
________________________________________________
Well the original post was wrong, wasn’t it? Either the Post is lying or Crowder is.
See post 7.
20 posted on
11/09/2023 9:36:19 AM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(A truth that’s told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
To: thegagline
Yeah, that much would be obvious. It’s logical and that’s where they would look. He said what they already know. It’s not like saying detective John Smith gave me the info.
61 posted on
11/09/2023 4:17:29 PM PST by
ChildOfThe60s
( If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson