To: Robert357
How can “weapons of war” be outlawed when the whole idea of the 2nd was to battle tyrannical governments, and that would include our own!?
Our Right’s are God given and I don’t need permission from politicians to exercise them!
Why is it so damn hard for people to understand that allowing others to deem what you can or can’t own for your protection will one day Own you!?
14 posted on
11/09/2023 12:25:33 AM PST by
justme4now
(Our Right's are God given and I don't need permission from politicians or courts to exercise them!)
To: justme4now
I guess that would require the courts to rule in such a way as to limit the federal and local government LEOs possession of law enforcement weapons to that of the populace. It is a fact that citizens encounter Lawless thugs more often than the law enforcement. If the citizen's rights to keep and bear arms are limited, they should be limited to no less than that of law enforcement. Make that the test to which laws apply. Pipe dream but fair.
20 posted on
11/09/2023 3:53:10 AM PST by
BOBWADE
(WWG1WGA)
To: justme4now
You need to read that wacko judges opinion that AR semiautomatic rifles should be regulated as if they were fully automatic (or select fire) weapons. It make no sense, and now that bumpstock regulations are thrown out by one federal judge, it just further cuts the feet off the argument that conflates AR’s with select fire or fully automatic M4’s
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson