[BOBWADE]

I guess that would require the courts to rule in such a way as to limit the federal and local government LEOs possession of law enforcement weapons to that of the populace. It is a fact that citizens encounter Lawless thugs more often than the law enforcement. If the citizen's rights to keep and bear arms are limited, they should be limited to no less than that of law enforcement. Make that the test to which laws apply. Pipe dream but fair.

[justme4now]

What’s fair is for government at all levels to keep their mitts off the 2nd!

In Marbury v. Madison the Supreme Court announced for the first time the principle that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution.

“All laws that are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”
Marbury v. Madison

The Constitution, thus the 2nd are not/is not a “Rights” grantor!

They are limitations on government .. all government!

No part of the Fed or local law enforcement have the authority to limit the 2nd in any way!