Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ashcroft, abortion opponents lose latest round of court challenges to ballot language
Saint Louis Post-Dispatch ^ | November 1, 2023 | Kurt Erickson , Jack Suntrup

Posted on 11/02/2023 8:19:27 AM PDT by Morgana

JEFFERSON CITY — A state appeals court Tuesday shot down Republican Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft’s bid to inject political language into a ballot question aimed at restoring abortion rights in Missouri.

Acting quickly on a hot-button issue that has been slowed by litigation, the Missouri Court of Appeals at Kansas City unanimously rejected the gubernatorial candidate’s appeal to reverse a lower court decision to strike and rewrite summary statements for six reproductive freedom ballot initiatives.

As part of his job as secretary of state, Ashcroft is tasked with writing ballot summaries for proposed constitutional changes. A physician sued over six petitions she filed after Ashcroft wrote summaries that she said were biased.

Ashcroft’s language asked if voters wanted to “allow for dangerous, unregulated, and unrestricted abortions, from conception to live birth, without requiring a medical license or potentially being subject to medical malpractice.”

In a ruling written by Judge Thomas Chapman, a three-judge panel of the appeals court agreed Ashcroft crossed a line.

“The Secretary’s summary statements are replete with politically partisan language,” Chapman wrote.

Ashcroft also appealed over the way Cole County Circuit Court Judge Jon Beetem rewrote the summaries, arguing that he didn’t include language outlining the dangers of abortion.

Again, the court sided with Beetem, saying his summary was “fair and sufficient.”

The American Civil Liberties Union, which has been handling the case for Dr. Anna Fitz-James, cheered the ruling, which came a day after the case was heard in a Kansas City courtroom with Ashcroft sitting with other attorneys arguing the case.

(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: abortion; elections; missouri; prolife

1 posted on 11/02/2023 8:19:27 AM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Hegel would be proud of today’s Leftists. “Reproductive Rights” ?? Really??


2 posted on 11/02/2023 8:25:23 AM PDT by griswold3 (Truth, Beauty and Goodness )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

Funny how “reproductive rights” hinge on the ability to make sure you never reproduce.


3 posted on 11/02/2023 8:29:07 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Or try to reproduce without any long term responsibility.


4 posted on 11/02/2023 8:39:36 AM PDT by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Proving the United States will not survive for long as God is done with it..


5 posted on 11/02/2023 8:48:18 AM PDT by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Jay is the son of John Ashcroft. These elite families do not represent us.


6 posted on 11/02/2023 8:53:47 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Translation: “The only partisan language allowed is OUR partisan language.”


7 posted on 11/02/2023 8:56:47 AM PDT by Antoninus (Republicans are all honorable men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Ashcroft’s language asked if voters wanted to “allow for dangerous, unregulated, and unrestricted abortions, from conception to live birth, without requiring a medical license or potentially being subject to medical malpractice."

To weak: ask voters if they want to “allow for dangerous, unregulated, and unrestricted murder of unborn children, for any reason aside from saving the physical life of the mother, from conception to live birth, regardless if a medical license is required or not.

8 posted on 11/02/2023 4:58:01 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Turn 2 the Lord Jesus who saves damned+destitute sinners on His acct, believe, b baptized+follow HIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson