I'm noticing a pattern with your posts on subjects like this.
When I present a rational example to demonstrate why something you insist is true isn't going to work, you just step back and tell me that I must explain why some alternative reality you support is worse than what we have now.
As is the case with so many people, you are seeing what you wish to see.
Again, my point is valid. How can throwing a monkey wrench into the legitimacy of Biden's election have turned out worse than what we have now?
If it had provoked any timidity on the part of Biden, that would have been better, instead, he went to work creating disasters as if he had a mandate.
Trying to halt or derail the proceedings might have accomplished nothing legally, but the cost versus benefit of *DOING SOMETHING* was well worth it had we but had the courage to try.
Even if nothing legally was accomplished, creating doubt about the legitimacy of Biden and his corrupt regime could have only benefited the people of the United States, and for that matter, the world.