Skip to comments.
New House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to overturn 2020 election, raising concerns about the next one
syracuse.com ^
| 10/26/23
| File AP
Posted on 10/26/2023 4:43:38 AM PDT by central_va
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: All
21
posted on
10/26/2023 5:04:48 AM PDT
by
Liz
(“The only time Biden gets his hands dirty is when he’s taking cash from foreign countries." Trump)
To: dowcaet
Exactly... and before that their years long campaign to “end the Bush Regime” after the 2000 election.
22
posted on
10/26/2023 5:06:47 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
To: central_va
Oh my. Someone had his panties in a twist.
To: central_va
24
posted on
10/26/2023 5:10:38 AM PDT
by
super7man
(Madam Defarge, knitting, knitting, always knitting.)
To: central_va
New House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to overturn 2020 election, raising concerns about the next one I'll take lies that pass for news for $200, Alex...
25
posted on
10/26/2023 5:12:34 AM PDT
by
Migraine
To: silent majority rising
What’s ironic is that a competent constitutional lawyer would have known that many of the measures taken to challenge the results of the 2020 election were futile at best and (in many cases) lacked any constitutional basis.
In a hypothetical question example that played out multiple times in 2020, State X has no legal standing to use the Federal courts to compel State Y to enforce its own election laws. This is where the infamous Texas lawsuit was destined to fall flat on its face regardless of the actual facts of the case.
26
posted on
10/26/2023 5:14:11 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
To: central_va
My feeling as well. Good first start.
27
posted on
10/26/2023 5:14:21 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
To: central_va
The democrats/MSM tried desparately to overturn the 2016 election. Why has striving to overturn an election suddenly become a hideous evil for these fools.
28
posted on
10/26/2023 5:14:57 AM PDT
by
odawg
To: All
You have to love that “election denier” is getting traction as a serious election issue.
Heck, the next president may depend on who is, or who isn’t, an “election denier.”
As a corollary, being a 2020 “election believer”.......is equally as potent an election issue.
29
posted on
10/26/2023 5:16:12 AM PDT
by
Liz
(“The only time Biden gets his hands dirty is when he’s taking cash from foreign countries." Trump)
To: Alberta's Child
Election fraud denial syndrome is strong in you.
30
posted on
10/26/2023 5:16:31 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: HighSierra5
We will find out soon if he releases the Jan. 6 tapes or not.
To: central_va
“the 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.”
There were the attackers but not all that happened there on Jan 6 was violent. Some attacked it while others did not. That’s the “tale of the tape”.
32
posted on
10/26/2023 5:25:24 AM PDT
by
equaviator
(If 60 is the new 40 then 35 must be the new 15.)
To: central_va
It sure didn’t take long for the left to kick into high gear to smear him, did it?
This is confirmation that he’s the right choice.
He NEEDS our support and prayers.
33
posted on
10/26/2023 5:25:29 AM PDT
by
metmom
(He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.)
To: Alberta's Child
In your hypothetical, who does have legal standing to use the federal courts to force a state to follow its own election laws, or more likely, to follow Constitutional requirements?
To: central_va
There’s no doubt in my mind that the 2020 election was corrupted behind repair. I’ve been saying this since even before Election Day in 2020.
The measures taken to “fix” it, however, were completely ineffective and (in many cases) carried out by inept fools.
35
posted on
10/26/2023 5:27:48 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
To: marktwain
The citizens of the state where the election laws were violated have clear standing — in STATE court.
And what particular “Constitutional requirement” is involved here?
36
posted on
10/26/2023 5:33:21 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
To: central_va
37
posted on
10/26/2023 5:37:52 AM PDT
by
jeffc
(Resident of the free State of Florida)
To: marktwain
P.S. — the Federal courts can only take action in cases where Federal laws or constitutional issues are at stake. That’s why election challenges in Federal courts are almost always based on matters related to the Civil Rights Act or the Voting Rights Act.
38
posted on
10/26/2023 5:37:56 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
To: jeffc
The bleating of sheep is only heard when we care to hear it.
I tune the sheep out.
39
posted on
10/26/2023 5:39:26 AM PDT
by
SamAdams76
(6,390,901 Truth | 86,874,940 Twitter)
To: central_va; All
40
posted on
10/26/2023 5:42:04 AM PDT
by
notdownwidems
(Washington D.C. has become the enemy of free people everywhere!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
