[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

That’s not true sir.

[CatOwner]

Could have fooled me.

[PIF]

Its true muslim apologist.

Mighty Mohammad codified killing Jews wherever they are found in the koran. The goal is no living Jews.

[Fungi]

What is the truth then? Can you explain?

[Olog-hai]

Yes it is.

Opus?

[E. Pluribus Unum]

That’s not true sir.

What's "not true" about it?

https://www.quora.com/How-many-times-did-Palestinians-reject-two-state-solutions

The Palestinians have actually had numerous opportunities to create an independent state, but have repeatedly rejected the offers:

1. In 1937, the Peel Commission proposed the partition of Palestine and the creation of an Arab state.
2. In 1939, the British White Paper proposed the creation of a unitary Arab state.
3. In 1947, the UN would have created an even larger Arab state as part of its partition plan.
4. The 1979 Egypt-Israel peace negotiations offered the Palestinians autonomy, which would almost certainly have led to full independence.
5. The Oslo agreements of the 1990s laid out a path for Palestinian independence, but the process was derailed by terrorism.
6. In 2000, Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered to create a Palestinian state in all of Gaza and 97 percent of the West Bank.
7. In 2008, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert offered to withdraw from almost the entire West Bank and partition Jerusalem on a demographic basis.
8. In addition 1948 to 1967, Israel did not control the West Bank. The Palestinians could have demanded an independent state from the Jordanians. On the contrary whilst Jordan was in control Arafat said there was no longer a claim as it was no longer part of Palestine. Once it was back in Israeli hands it miraculously became disputed land again! This is one of many reasons Jews and Israelis are cynical.

The Palestinians have spurned each of these opportunities. A variety of reasons have been given for why the Palestinians have in Abba Eban’s words, “never missed an opportunity to miss an opportunity.” Historian Benny Morris has suggested that the Palestinians have religious, historical, and practical reasons for opposing an agreement with Israel. He says that “Arafat and his generation cannot give up the vision of the greater land of Israel for the Arabs. [This is true because] this is a holy land, Dar al-Islam [the world of Islam]. It was once in the hands of the Muslims, and it is inconceivable [to them] that infidels like us [the Israelis] would receive it.” The Palestinians also believe that time is on their side. “They feel that demographics will defeat the Jews in one hundred or two hundred years, just like the Crusaders.” The Palestinians, Morris says, also hope the Arabs will acquire nuclear weapons in the future that will allow them to defeat Israel.

In 2000, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered to withdraw from 97 percent of the West Bank and 100 percent of the Gaza Strip. In addition, he agreed to dismantle 63 isolated settlements. In exchange for the 3 percent annexation of the West Bank. Israel said it would give up territory in the Negev that would increase the size of the Gaza territory by roughly a third.

[popdonnelly]

Oh, sure it’s not true.

[bert]

First of all there are no Palestinians. There are the West Bank PA and the Gazan Hamas. They are separate and distinct political entities. There is no unity.

Thus, there is no Palestine.

In reality it seems there are three states, Israel, West Bank and Gaza.

Neither Gaza nor West Bank has the ability to exist absent Israel. There is no Palestinian GDP capable of supporting stand alone nations.

Presently, Hamas is being eradicated to the bone. Gaza supports Hamas and must be politically restructured with no Hamas cancer draining political and economic resources.