Posted on 10/18/2023 2:20:32 PM PDT by thegagline
Former President Donald Trump on Monday shared a link listing the home address of New York Attorney General Letitia James while accusing her of committing a “miscarriage of justice.”
Trump’s smearing of James, the prosecutor behind his ongoing financial fraud trial, is nothing new. But his Truth Social link to a Substack post by far-right journalist Laura Loomer reportedly might raise a few issues.
In an attempted gotcha piece on James’ purchase of a home in Brooklyn, New York, Loomer posted documents that list the property’s address, information that would normally be redacted to protect the subject. In June, James said she had received death threats as she pursued the case against Trump, currently the Republican presidential front-runner for 2024.
The Daily Beast suggested that by sharing Loomer’s piece, the quadruply indicted former president might be violating a gag order in the New York case ― not to be confused with the gag order he got slapped with for his federal election-conspiracy trial.
Judge Arthur Engoron specified that Trump was not to attack court staff after he mocked a photo of a law clerk with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). “While James is not a staffer, she is central to the indictment,” The Daily Beast notes.
The anti-Trump outlet Meidas Touch called attention to the apparent doxxing. The site called on Engoron “to expand his gag order to protect NY AG Letitia James.”
Doxxing, or the release of someone’s personal information with malicious intent, is generally not considered illegal if the information is publicly available, according to U.S. News & World Report. In this case, the information about James’ address could already be accessed by the public, independently of Loomer’s post.
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
Does the FBI pay you cash or precious metals?
Google Street View reveals that they pay her pretty well to persecute conservatives...
HEADLINE: raging against her.
No agenda here.
So there is no problem.............................
Correction So there SHOULD be no problem.
“As an aside, Laura Loomer is probably not the best source to rely upon or retweet.”
That’s a remarkably dumb statement, considering the source(s) of the article you posted. LMAO!
barry soetero’s house in chicago was listed as a vacant lot on the tax roles
well, his address is published, so...
In this case, the information about James’ address could already be accessed by the public, independently of Loomer’s post.
And there is the bottom line...
Guess it’s ok when that chick from the Wash Post does it though.
A big question is:
State offices are in Albany. Brooklyn isn’t exactly down the street.
Nor is Brooklyn cheap. Especially if it’s in one of the “hipster areas”. Taxes are high.
Before she was AG she held some other inconsequential position in the state government. Whose salary, I’m betting, wasn’t enough to squirrel away enough cash for two homes.
In 2022, NY AG made $234,248. NY is going to take damn near half. And if she’s practicing in NYC, the city gets its cut as well.
How much and who paid for it? If she did, how?
Aw, Gee Whiz.
So now we’re back to doxing being bad. Got it. Hard to keep up. It changes so quickly.
>Huffington Post???? Really?????
Look at the bright side, you do not need to clear your cookies and cache since the essence of the article was posted here.
Doxxing is not nearly as much fun when it gets turned upon the denizens of the Deep State. But the rules of engagement are already set, and if one side uses them, then fair to use the same application against the perpetrators.
Actually, if memory serves me correctly, the Obama house was listed on the tax records as belonging to a judge in Chicago and the yard next to it being under the Obama’s. The yard next to the house wasn’t large enough for a home to be built on it and didn’t seem as though it should have been able to have been severed from the home due to the location.
Loomer had put that out on the internet before Trump ever saw it. Also, it is accessible from the clerk of courts office by internet. Anyone could or could have already had it. Nothing secretive. No story in spite of the headline.
“I question his judgement.”
I bet you do, because lots and lots of people who have not accomplished one one thousandth of what he has are always questioning his judgement. What Loomer posted can be had on the internet by anyone who thought to go looking for it.
Boo, hoo, ho. Talk to the Conservative SCOTUS Justices. Don’t care.
Yahoo News & Huffington Post
Honestly, it does not get any worse. trash.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.