Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New evidence may destroy Biden’s defense in his classified documents case
The Hill ^ | BY JONATHAN TURLEY

Posted on 10/14/2023 5:24:12 PM PDT by NoLibZone

This month, the sudden appearance of Special Counsel Robert Hur caused as much of a stir as Bigfoot suddenly appearing on Pennsylvania Avenue. Unlike his counterpart, Special Counsel Jack Smith, who has been aggressively prosecuting former president Donald Trump, Hur has virtually disappeared since his appointment to investigate President Joe Biden. Hur surfaced to interview Biden over his possession of classified documents, including some that go back to his time as a U.S. senator.

I have referred to Hur as a “neutron prosecutor” — a special counsel with no possible charge, under Justice Department policy barring the indictment of a sitting president. If that was not enough of a problem, Hur may have growing evidence that accounts offered by the White House over the discovery of the documents are false.

The new evidence could prove transformative, not only for the criminal but the impeachment investigation of the president. This week, the House Oversight Committee released a new timeline on the discovery of classified documents in various locations associated with Biden. From the outset, many of us flagged problems with the account that had been given by Biden, who insisted that he had no knowledge or involvement in the removal or use of the documents. The most glaring problem is that, after they were removed at the end of his term as vice president, the documents were repeatedly moved and divided up. Some were found in the Penn Center office used by Biden in Washington, D.C. Others were found in his garage and reportedly in his library.

Biden made clear from the beginning that he expected the investigation to be perfunctory and brief. He publicly declared that he has “no regrets” over his own conduct and told the public that the documents investigation would soon peter out when it determined that “there is no ‘there’ there.” Now, however, it appears that a critical claim by the White House in the scandal may not only be false, but was knowingly false at the time it was made. The White House and Biden’s counsel have long maintained that, as soon as documents were discovered in the D.C. office, they notified the national archives. Many asked why they did not call the FBI, but the White House has at least maintained that, unlike Trump, they took immediate action to notify authorities.

However, it now appears that this was not true. One of the closest aides to Biden and a close friend to Hunter Biden is Annie Tomasini. She referred to Hunter as her “brother” and signed off messages with “LY” or “love you.” Tomasini was once a senior aide to Joe Biden and, according to the Oversight Committee, inspected the classified material on March 18, 2021, two months after Biden took office — nearly 20 months before they were said to be found by the Biden team.

The committee now alleges that the White House “omitted months of communications, planning, and coordinating among multiple White House officials, [Kathy] Chung, Penn Biden Center employees, and President Biden’s personal attorneys to retrieve the boxes containing classified materials. The timeline also omitted multiple visits from at least five White House employees, including Dana Remus, Anthony Bernal, Ashley Williams, Annie Tomasini, and an unknown staffer.”

If true, the evidence demolishes the timeline long maintained by the Biden team. That could have an immediate impact on both the criminal and impeachment investigations. The timeline has been a critical distinction drawn by the White House in distinguishing this matter from the Trump indictment, in which Smith charged the former president with 37 counts, including retaining classified information, obstructing justice and making false statements, and other charges.

Biden insisted that he was entirely “surprised” by the discovery of the documents in Nov. 2021. He echoed the narrative of both his lawyers and the media at large: “And they did what they should have done,” he said. “They immediately called the Archives — immediately called the Archives, turned them over to the Archives, and I was briefed about this discovery.”

In reality, Biden’s counsel and associates conducted repeated searches and declared repeatedly that no further classified documents were found. That was repeatedly found to be untrue.

Moreover, the concern is that Biden’s lawyers, in the course of these private searches, may have consolidated material and contaminated the scene by the time FBI agents conducted their searches. This includes changing how documents were originally stored and whether classified markings were visible to anyone working around the Biden home or garage. Now it appears that the discovery had actually been made months earlier. The timeline would now more closely mirror Trump’s timeline in the knowing retention of classified material, the failure to turn over all of the classified material despite assurances from counsel, and alleged false accounts about the document’s discovery.

It is not clear what Hur can do if he finds either from witnesses or forensic testing (including perhaps fingerprints on the documents) that President Biden lied.

I have long disagreed with the policy that the Justice Department has long held, that prosecutors should not indict a sitting president. Were he to seek an indictment, Hur would have to ask for reconsideration of the policy based on a decades-old memo issued by the Office of Legal Counsel under President Bill Clinton, who at the time faced calls for an indictment for perjury.

The DOJ policy will also put pressure on the House in its ongoing impeachment inquiry. In my recent testimony at the first Biden impeachment inquiry hearing, I mapped out four possible articles of impeachment. They included obstruction and abuse of power.

If this new timeline is accurate, the question is whether Biden knew that the account being put forward by his staff and counsel was false. It also raises the question of whether the president knowingly possessed classified documents and lied about their removal, use, and discovery. Finally, if Biden repeated his public denials to Hur, there could be added allegations of false statements to federal investigators, another commonly-charged federal crime.

We still have to see if there is evidence to support such crimes, but what is clear is that the past narrative may no longer suffice. In his press conference announcing the criminal charges against Trump, Smith declared, “We have one set of laws in this country, and they apply to everyone….Nothing more, nothing less.” The question for Hur is whether they can also apply to a sitting president. Likewise, if these allegations are true and Biden knowingly committed these crimes, the question for Congress could be whether he should remain as president.

Jonathan Turley is the J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University Law School.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bidencorruption; bidendocuments; documents; turley

1 posted on 10/14/2023 5:24:12 PM PDT by NoLibZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Yeah, yeah....sure.

Ping me when the Big Guy is indicted/arrested/perp walked.

TIA.


2 posted on 10/14/2023 5:24:55 PM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a conspiracy theory in ‘20 is now fact. Land of the sheep, home of the knaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Why does he need a defense when there is a 0% he will be punished?


3 posted on 10/14/2023 5:25:03 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

These people crack me up.

They think they are still living in the Before Time.


4 posted on 10/14/2023 5:26:48 PM PDT by Jim Noble (They have taken untold millions that they never toiled to earn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
We still have to see if there is evidence to support such crimes

I think I can help you out there:

There is no evidence.
It's been debunked.
This is old news.
Can't we just move on?
Hey, why aren't you indicting Trump for something?

5 posted on 10/14/2023 5:29:41 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (They say "Our Democracy" but they mean Cosa Nostra.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
when the never post bitches show up:


6 posted on 10/14/2023 5:41:55 PM PDT by NoLibZone (We are not the offspring of the American patriot movement. We are emailing cowards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

He has zero rights to the classified docs. He stole them and sold them to the communist Chinese.


7 posted on 10/14/2023 5:46:39 PM PDT by minnesota_bound (Need more money to buy everything now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Why read a story with the word “may” in the headline?


8 posted on 10/14/2023 5:51:05 PM PDT by HotKat (Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

And Hussein knew all about it the whole time.


9 posted on 10/14/2023 6:00:39 PM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
"New evidence may destroy Biden’s defense in his classified documents case"

.... Am I missing something???? .... I thought all of this info was already established???

.

10 posted on 10/14/2023 6:21:14 PM PDT by R_Kangel ("A nation of sheep will beget a nation ruled by wolves")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Good one... so true! Had a good chuckle.


11 posted on 10/14/2023 6:27:01 PM PDT by existentially_kuffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HotKat

>>>Why read a story with the word “may” in the headline?

may = lawyer escape clause


12 posted on 10/14/2023 6:29:45 PM PDT by existentially_kuffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone; Jane Long; All

There is enough evidence.

#ImpeachBiden

Investigate #BidenCaliphate


13 posted on 10/14/2023 7:28:31 PM PDT by Syncro (God is Good Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

To destroy a defense, someone has to be on offense. I’m not seeing that in this case.


14 posted on 10/14/2023 10:13:44 PM PDT by MortMan (I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Bkmk


15 posted on 10/14/2023 10:32:18 PM PDT by sauropod (I will stand for truth even if I stand alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Biden knowingly committed these crimes.

Wonder how much ground that covers as far as the eye can see?.


16 posted on 10/15/2023 8:20:11 AM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Oh, no doubt there is PLENTY of evidence.

I’ll be shocked if it ever happens, tho :-(


17 posted on 10/15/2023 8:51:22 AM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a conspiracy theory in ‘20 is now fact. Land of the sheep, home of the knaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

later


18 posted on 10/15/2023 8:18:46 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Two Words: Banana Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson