p
I wonder if they agree to go to DC to view the documents would this somehow allow Smith to get the case moved to DC where he can get a rabid Demsoc Judge? Or just get a DC judge to decide what can and can not be accessed? There is some reason he is doing this.
I would think that if Smith filed the case in Florida that is his problem providing access in Florida is his problem. If he refuses to do that, just rule in favor of the defendant with prejudice.
‘all’ discovery that they will release to the defense, that is.
It’s been a good week.
Did I miss the raids on obama and biden?
They have classified docs. obama stores them in a unused furniture store guarded by no one and Biden was not suppose to have any at all in his garage or office at a university that is funded by the communist chinese.
Thanks to a stolen election, America’s worst nightmare is now a reality ...our government has been hijacked by Organized Crime.
Jack O (Off) Smith is abusing the justice system.
Cannon should dismiss the case outright for misprosecution.
Simple solution: exclude all evidence that has not yet been handed over in discovery.
Deep State is retrenching.
I am guessing this is pretty much a nothing burger and it’s another bs indictment. So I am guessing Trump will eventually file counter suit to sue for his costs to be covered. Who pays that money.
“And, months after the Office’s representation to the Court, discovery is not complete in this case—including with respect to the classified documents at issue in more than 25% of the [Espionage Act] counts in the Superseding Indictment.”
Discovery is not complete???
Now, weren’t we led to believe that the government had ALL its ducks in a row before the Trump indictment? And, as a result, they could have turned over all the evidence in one container on day one? In fact, they would have turned over everything they had with jubilation since they had Trump pinned down; it was fait accompli.
March 4…the day before Super Tuesday.
I distinctly remember that there was talk of investigating Biden for corruption BEFORE he had declared himself as a candidate for the 2020 election, and the Dems and their media shills went berserk, calling it election interference. But there’s no election interference, not if the Dems do it.
The Espionage Act does not even apply to ex President’s. The Espionage Act was passed in 1917. Until implementation of the Presidential Records Act in 1980, Ex Presidents routinely removed Presidential records with them when they left office and these records contained National Defense Information. No ex President has ever been charged under the Espionage Act for their possession of National Defense Information. Ex Presidents naturally retain their authorization to hold and view National Defense Information unless that authorization is formerly rescinded.
If the multiple cases against Trump were not to get him “convicted” before the election in November 2024, then they were set up to have the election “under the cloud suspicion Trump could later be convicted after the election”.
It would be hard to conduct this trial with the other ones going on.