Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reverend Wright

they’re also good for probing weaknesses in the Russian “air defenses”

guess Vlady shouldn’t have stripped all those S-400 systems of their missiles just so he could bomb Ukraine last fall, huh


8 posted on 08/30/2023 2:20:28 PM PDT by canuck_conservative (there would be no more need for NATO, if Russia could just stop attacking its neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: canuck_conservative

There are severe weaknesses in Ukraine to take down a nuclear armed missile.


33 posted on 08/30/2023 3:24:48 PM PDT by entropy12 (Career politicians like Desantis build wealth. Trump sacrificed his wealth to serve people. GO TRUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

I believe the Russians were using S300 missiles for bombardment, not the new S400 ones. As the Russians seem to have mostly replaced their S300 systems with S400’s, at least in European Russia, the S300’s are available for other uses.

It makes sense, given the Russians scarce resources, to repurpose a redundant resource they have a lot of.

Besides being a not very accurate bombardment missile, it could have served a purpose in inducing the Ukrainians to waste their own SAMs on them. I dont know if this happened, but looking at it from the Russian POV it was worth a try.

That said, neither S300 nor S400 are any good at intercepting low flying drones that dont give much of a radar signature. Those SAMs were made for a very different category of target.


37 posted on 08/30/2023 3:50:37 PM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson