Posted on 08/17/2023 7:23:54 PM PDT by NetAddicted
Does it count as waffling if he waffles your way?
He didn’t “correct” anything. He flip flopped because he’s now running in a GOP primary. I can’t believe anyone is falling for this WEF loving, Soros sponsored, grifter.
Ramaswarmydingdong is still trying to figure it all out
I don’t get it. Why does the why matter?
This is so stupid. Why is this even an issue? Maybe some people are born gay, and maybe it is not a “gene” meaning you will never know if people are born with it or not. But why are Republicans arguing over this? This is exactly the distractions that Democrats want Republicans to argue about
“The Turks are at the walls of our city of Constantinople but let’s keep arguing over what color were the eyes of the Virgin Mary”
One Guy’s hot take: The question seemed planted, the answer scripted and rehearsed.
Good analogy!
You are right. It was planted and scripted
Because he probably blurted out his true feelings the first time and this is just an attempt to CYA afterwards
It seems an unnecessary topic and distraction.
There are gay people. I don’t care why. Just my .02
Asserting that some are born to be sexual perverts removes the responsibility of behavior.
He just caught flack and realized he alienated voters.
Walked it back publicly.
No one knows what this chameleon thinks.
Screw “orientation”...what matters is application aka BEHAVIORS.
You do realize that straight people can be perverts also, right?
He wants to give Humper and his retard daddy a get out of jail free card
“what matters is application aka BEHAVIORS”
I agree, notice the Bible does not say a man finding another man romantically attractive is a bad thing, it just says “don’t do sodomy” which should also equally apply to a man and woman as well.
BINGO!
Because unlike the left, the right is so independent that they can unify on any issue. This one is easy, which makes it a slam dunk to unify, but it won’t going to happen. And you actually stated part of what the standard response from Republicans should be: “Why is this even an issue? As a Republican, I believe all people should be treated equally under the law and all Americans should equally enjoy all of our constitutional rights." Period. Don’t say a single word more other than next question please.
I can make up my own mind whether I want to associate or vote for a faggot. That fits within my constitutional rights.
The Rama-dama Dig-dong Swamy seems to be making statement on all sides of every issue. Say, isn’t that what Demon-craps do?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.