Posted on 07/24/2023 4:47:13 PM PDT by upchuck
On Friday, we analyzed a just-released FBI 'FD-1023' document, in which a trusted FBI informant asserted that executives from Burisma -- the Ukrainian energy company that famously employed then-Vice President Joe Biden's son, despite his dearth of relevant expertise, while the elder Biden was running point on Ukraine policy in the Obama administration -- had described a multimillion-dollar bribery scheme that enriched both of the aforementioned Bidens. The Bureau's confidential human source (CHS) told investigators that the Burisma leaders held a dim view of Hunter Biden's personal value and intellect, but kept the generous payments flowing to him because Hunter would "take care of all of those issues through his dad.” The function of the younger Biden, the company's CFO reportedly said, was “to protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems.”
One such problem, allegedly, was an investigation by a Ukrainian prosecutor into Burisma, which the firm's leadership wanted to go away. To that end, per former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy's summary of the CHS' accusations, "the founder of Burisma recounted being pressured by then-Vice President Joe Biden to put Biden’s son Hunter on the Ukrainian energy company’s board, and for $10 million in bribes — $5 million each to Joe and Hunter Biden — in order to use Biden’s political influence to force the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating Burisma." That man was, in fact, fired, after Vice President Biden explicitly linked the firing as a prerequisite for unlocking $1 billion is US taxpayer aid. Biden subsequently boasted about this very episode in public remarks.
The Federalist's Margot Cleveland immediately noted that the CHS' account directly contradicted Biden's explanation for triggering the firing, writing that the Burisma executive's alleged statement to the CHS "proves significant because Joe Biden had long claimed he pushed for Shokin’s firing because Shokin was not investigating Burisma — which is the exact opposite of the details summarized in the FD-1023." The FD-1023 includes a recollection from the CHS, who said Burisma bigwigs weren't concerned about the claimed $10 million in bribery funds ever being discovered because they "did not send funds directly to “the big guy” (a reference to Joe Biden), and that the payments to the Bidens had been routed through so many companies and bank accounts that it would take investigators ten years to trace the payments to Joe Biden." As we pointed out, House Oversight Committee Republicans have produced bank records showing millions of dollars in foreign (largely Chinese) money flowing to nine different Biden family members through an intricate series of shell corporations -- quite possibly underscoring a modus operandi, at the very least.
My reaction to all of this was to highlight the serious nature of the informant's allegations, while also remaining healthily skeptical and asking more questions. One central question was whether any of the CHS' statements in the document were ever corroborated. If not, was that because they weren't investigated, or because they were probed and found to be unreliable? And if so, wouldn't that be a big deal? Again writing at The Federalist, Cleveland cites a source "familiar with the briefing" who says FBI agents did confirm several components of the CHS' story before handing the information off to the Delaware investigation -- who seem to have dropped those leads. If this is true, this isn't just more smoke engulfing the Bidens; it's another scandal at the DOJ and FBI.
Good thing we have a justice department to prosecute these kinds of crimes.
And Hussein knew about the whole thing. Democratics better step up pretty soon and give Gropin’ Joe the boot.
You are funny.😡
They need to trace the money, but they aren’t even trying.
“It would take investigators ten years to trace it to Biden. “
So we just won’t try. What a sh*t show of nothingness to keep hope alive among Republican voters.
Biden will never be charged with a crime.
Trump will die in jail.
Republicans are fine with both.
Call me when any one of these commie traitors are hanging by their necks.
.
Thanks Upchuck!
.
Now they’re in *big* trouble!
/s
Bttt.
5.56mm
That is exactly right. Dems have to ditch him. He is sinking their ship. I think they should ditch Kamala first, and that would be so easy.
Three-monkey Shuffle.
remember when the media went ape #### over Trump tweeting “look at this photograph”?
Oh yeah, looking really bad for the dems who control the Senate and House by way of RINOs, plus the DOJ/FBI.
They’re doomed I tell ya. The walls are closing in. /S
Good post.
Guess I’m not a Republican, then.
No tolerance of this stuff from me.
Why there? Bttg and watch them suffer. Record it in fact.
Well everyone on here is an above average voter, just not enough of us to make a difference.
When that happens, I plan to license a concession stand near the gallows, selling beer and soft drinks to the long lines of people waiting to spit (or whatever) on the traitor's carcass as it slowly rots off the noose.
I will believe it when I see it.
Never. Gonna. Happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.