Millions of cars daily analyzed by artificial intelligence for 'suspicious' behavior

americanthinker ^ | 07/24/2023

[devane617]

Dystopian surveillance is here and providing a growing market for tech entrepreneurs. Police agencies are daily using artificial intelligence to identify "suspicious" patterns of behavior in millions of random cars caught on surveillance cameras connecting with databases of ownership, and enabling searches and arrests. In an era with politicized law enforcement, what could go wrong?

[Grampa Dave]

Forgive my ignorance, but what exactly do you mean “who have the resources to know which vehicles to pull over”?

Don’t think locally.

[Grampa Dave]

Be careful now.

[P.O.E.]

First, they ruined taking your date out for a car ride with the freakin’ consoles in the way. Now this.

[Enterprise]

Defense attorneys have been suspicious for some time now that Federal agencies use resources to spy domestically. The attorneys believe that information gained illegally is then turned over to law enforcement. Officers initiate stops which yield large quantities of narcotics.

[al baby]

They shot our clown !!!!

[thefactor]

I guess it depends on your definition of “spying.” Several federal agencies have the power to investigate criminality. They are then free to hand over the intel to local agencies who are then free to stop the car in question. I don’t call that spying.

[Pajamajan]

Cars have suspicious behavior? Who knew?

[Zathras]

Florida Man: “What’s that clicking noise?”

[Grampa Dave]

.

[Smokin' Joe]

He obeyed all the traffic laws. He has to be up to something!

[Mr.Unique]

was that translated from another language?

It's poorly written for sure.

[rey]

Funny report. What causes accidents is people exceeding the speed limit not people doing the speed limit in the way of speeders. If speeders obeyed the law and didn’t exceed the speed limit, there’d be no conflict. By the logic of this report, people shot in robberies are the cause of the shooting. They should simply cede their worldly goods to the robber and all will be well.

[Libloather]

This can be used on election day, yes?

[CodeToad]

Screw with these stupid systems. Go drive down a street you never drive, stop for 10 seconds, then drive away fast. Do the same ting at 2:00am at the same spot.

[minnesota_bound]

Nothing suspicious here. Just 2 people following the gps and crashed. After they are rescued they run away.

Car drives off private stairway in San Francisco, flips onto street below
https://www.yahoo.com/news/car-drives-off-private-stairway-132236811.html

[minnesota_bound]

#44 I had a co-worker in another dept who had a private plane. He was tracked going from Calif to some eastern state on the weekend. From news accounts I later read online from the eastern state he and a friend unloaded the plane and checked into a motel. The police arrested both for smuggling marijuana. He called me on monday at the Helpdesk and asked to have his password unlocked. His account was disabled. The management must have been informed. He was probably on a list of people the police were tracking.

[IYAS9YAS]

In Texas and other states it is illegal to drive in the Left Lane(passing lane) unless you are over taking a vehicle without regard to speed limit.

You realize both the article you linked to, and the Texas Transportation Code linked in the article still say speed limits still apply even while passing. The speed limit information is much farther down the code than the passing information, but it's there.

[Trailerpark Badass]

What don’t you comprehend about logic? Unless you have a badge, it’s not your job to passive-aggressively enforce your favored traffic laws.

[rey]

Thanks for the chuckle. That’s a riot about favored traffic laws.

I agree, slower traffic keep right. However, it begs the question, slower than what? That what is the speed limit. No, you don’t drive 45 in the left lane. Yes, you drive as close to the speed limit as possible given the conditions. No, you don’t go 80 in a 65 even if everyone is doing it. In fact, technically speaking, we are all supposed to be in the rightmost lanes, except when passing. Going 85 doesn’t give you the left lane for your entire journey. The guy going 65 to pass a 60 guy.

Number one cause of wrecks? Speed, closely followed by tires and brakes.

The flow of traffic argument is flawed. It’s the same argument that is used by the handful of people that are arrested looting. Everyone is doing it. It won’t fly in court. Go ahead and try. 1 MPH over is breaking the law. I’m not saying to enforce the law that stringently, but it is incomprehensible that someone on this site doesn’t recognize a legal infraction.

I’ve been to traffic court and civil court and the flow of traffic argument has NEVER gotten anyone off. But, hey, do what you like, and when you are in civil court for crashing into someone while speeding and forever altering their lives, you can be self satisfied knowing you were going with the flow.

[Trailerpark Badass]

On the controlled-access highway I spend the most time on, 90% of traffic, when it’s clear, is going 72-77 mph. That’s how fast I’m gonna go. Funny you’ve been to traffic court, I haven’t. You want to be Dudley Do-Right and go 65, be my guest.