Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Owners Action League brings the receipts in its takedown of "Lawful Citizens Imprisonment Act"
Bearing Arms ^ | 7/20/23 | Cam Edwards

Posted on 07/20/2023 12:58:44 PM PDT by CFW

As supporters of HD 4420 try to rally their fellow lawmakers behind a plan to hurriedly enact the sweeping gun control bill into law before the end of the month, Massachusetts’ Gun Owners Action League has released a detailed response to what its labeled the “Lawful Citizens Imprisonment Act.”

In a sign of just how terrible this legislation truly is, GOAL’s markup of the bill stretches to nine pages, and the group acknowledges at the outset that it “by no means represents the entirety of the concerns of Gun Owners’ Action League or the Second Amendment community,” and is instead “simply a response to the incredibly vague and dishonest ‘summary’ provided to the legislature by leadership.” I’d encourage you to read the entire takedown by GOAL here, because its far too long to quote in its entirety, but I do want to highlight a few specific issues raised by GOAL, starting with the bill’s new definition of “safe storage”. According to that vague and dishonest summary put out by Democratic leadership in the legislature:

[snip]

GOAL warns that every employee in a common carrier facility like UPS or FedEx could have to possess a license to carry in order to comply with the law, while their facilities would have to have a storage area that meets the new definitions of the “safe storage” provisions. GOAL warns that this “would essentially mean that interstate and intrastate commerce of lawful products would cease” and would lead to gun shops shutting down in short order, “leaving no legal means of obtaining products in Massachusetts.”

(Excerpt) Read more at bearingarms.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; goal; hd4420; massachusetts
The politicians who are sponsoring this bill need to be removed from office.

They know if it is passed, by the time it goes through the Courts and declared unconstitutional, firearms dealers will have gone out of business, and many people will have taken steps to comply with the new law. Thus leaving them helpless from abuses by the criminals or the State (actually one and the same).

1 posted on 07/20/2023 12:58:44 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW
“leaving no legal means of obtaining products in Massachusetts.”

Well, that's their goal!!

2 posted on 07/20/2023 1:01:38 PM PDT by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Unarmed Massachusetts, eh? Well criminals aren’t stupid.


3 posted on 07/20/2023 1:03:33 PM PDT by griswold3 (Truth, Beauty and Goodness )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

This is an amazingly bad law, even for the people’s republic of Massachusetts.

Basically the gun-grabber’s wish list, handily compiled in a single document.


4 posted on 07/20/2023 1:42:50 PM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
"The politicians who are sponsoring this bill need to be removed from office the planet."
5 posted on 07/20/2023 2:03:02 PM PDT by HKMk23 (https://youtu.be/LTseTg48568)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
The solution is simple, but it needs to be a unified one by all the gun owners in the state:

An unenforceable law is a moot law. Some legislators need to be reminded of that.

6 posted on 07/20/2023 2:26:37 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

***Unarmed Massachusetts,***

Well, that was the British goal in 1775. Didn’t work then but the elites are trying again?


7 posted on 07/20/2023 3:28:21 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (“No man’s life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson