Posted on 07/15/2023 9:35:12 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
How does a car, home electrical appliance, or computer manufacturer typically assure the safety of its products? Well, they typically engage in some form of self-regulation. Companies competing with each other are interested in the success of their products and want to make as much money as they can. If a company finds itself risking a loss of revenue as a result of a manufacturing error or lack of safety, it typically corrects or refrains from actions that are responsible for the loss of profits.
However, this may not be the case if profitable conduct contains no liability. Should this be the case, the easy route to attaining greater profitability will be taken. Indeed, such is the case in the world of vaccines, which proves to be the world’s exception to the rule.
Attorney Aaron Siri of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) who has worked a great deal on vaccine-related issues like vaccine injury claims, vaccine exemptions and vaccine policy work, gave testimony to the Arizona State Senate on May 25th. His impressive two-hour presentation sought to answer the question: How can this system that people rely on fail us so badly? But to understand the failure is to understand the context within which the new vaccines arose. We need to understand what happened 37 years ago.
In 1986, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (HR5546). This is an historic act because it removed liability for childhood injury vaccines. Removing liability tends to alter the behavior of entities that benefit. Indeed, it turned out that pharmaceutical companies were no longer liable for injuries caused by their products. That has been the law since 1986.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Because the Wuhan Vaccine along with the Wuhan Virus are politically motivated by the Left to use these things as excuses for installing more totalitarian government.
Nothing screams “safe and effective” like working hard to remove liability. Remember when Obamacare was so great that Congress immediately exempted themselves from it?
The question is why would they need to pass such an act? They know they aren’t safe!
Big Pharma has outstanding lobbyists.
They figured out early that controlling politicians was a lot more important than worrying about vaccine safety.
Yup—if they won’t stand behind their products with liability then I won’t stand behind them either.
If someone develops a vaccine that offers full protection against this virus but causes adverse effects — including death — in 1% of the people who take it.
The purpose of the liability protection is to eliminate the financial risk that would keep the manufacturer in this scenario from making the desperately- needed vaccine available.
“The purpose of the liability protection is to eliminate the financial risk that would keep the manufacturer in this scenario from making the desperately- needed vaccine available.”
That would make sense in the very narrow scenario you gave—but we have never had such a scenario.
The liability protection is pure grift in the real world.
Then make that the law. Not the blanket immunity for all vaccines. Really HPV vax gets immunity?
BTT
$$$$$$
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.