Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/06/2023 8:11:52 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: george76
Columbia Law School: "We have an obligation," the office added, "to … ensure that our decision processes are consistent with the law."


2 posted on 07/06/2023 8:17:28 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

At the end of the day there will be little to no immediate effect — ‘cause the racists will try to get around.

But, this ruling gives anyone supposedly hurt by such racism standing and precedent to file a lawsuit. The criminal organization will settle.

It could be a death by a thousand cuts. I’d prefer a guillotine in the public square where the racist bureaucrats are lined up, but I could live with a slow death.


3 posted on 07/06/2023 8:17:59 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Stalling tactic.

They are trying to figure a way around it.........................


4 posted on 07/06/2023 8:19:28 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

A long history of this. In February of 1990 I was temporarily without a car and took the bus to work. I was always a newspaper scanner, but at that time read it from cover to cover, as the trip took two hours. I distinctly remember reading an article how this Kenyan was just appointed as first head of the Harvard Law Review. Of course now we know that he was academically distinguished that the appointment is unsurprising. He gloriously went on the become the first President of the Harvard Law Review not to publish and articlenduring his tenure


7 posted on 07/06/2023 8:25:12 AM PDT by j.havenfarm (22 years on Free Republic, 12/10/22! more then 6500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Legal academia is already feeling the heat from the Supreme Court’s decision. Within 24 hours of the ruling, the conservative public interest firm America First Legal sent letters to 200 law schools demanding that they scrap racial preferences not just in student admissions but also in faculty hiring and law reviews.

“We will represent victims of these policies and sue any law school that allows these illegal and discriminatory practices to continue,” the letters read.”

‘The pause at Columbia indicates that the school’s journals have similar programs, as do the demographic data solicited by the Columbia Law Review. Applicants are asked about their race, gender, and sexual orientation, according to segments of application form reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon, and can also submit “other relevant information” about their “personal identity.’


8 posted on 07/06/2023 8:26:33 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (We have no shortage of experts, stating B$ as fact, & they have no idea nor reality re solutions!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

There might be legal consequences for racial discrimination? Horrors!!! How did that genie ever get out of the bottle?


10 posted on 07/06/2023 8:28:11 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Colleges should have no problem telling who’s an eeevvvil White straight male with all body parts intact when they read the application essay. Also, it shouldn’t be very difficult to tell who’s a member of America’s #1 preferred minority.

Essays that follow all the rules of grammar and spelling will be rejected. Same for those that tell all about volunteer missionary work in Indonesia. Coming from an intact family will not help you get admitted.

There’s always the name. Kevin O’connor just wasted a stamp sending in his app. Shantavious Jackson will do better.


12 posted on 07/06/2023 8:30:43 AM PDT by I want the USA back (A man is not a woman. A woman is not a man. There is no in-between or undefined middle. Cat = cat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

The left will ultimately embrace this decision because of illegal immigration.

If I recollect correctly, the affirmative action type statutes didn’t actually say black/white but “disadvantage minority”.

Thanks to illegal immigrants flooding the country and having more rights than residents means that whites will soon be the disadvantaged minority.


13 posted on 07/06/2023 8:30:51 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
Within 24 hours of the ruling, the conservative public interest firm America First Legal sent letters to 200 law schools demanding that they scrap racial preferences not just in student admissions but also in faculty hiring and law reviews. "We will represent victims of these policies and sue any law school that allows these illegal and discriminatory practices to continue," the letters read.

Endowments are at risk and lawsuits with the backing of a SCOTUS ruling will have great weight. I'll bet universities are hesitant to be too cute by half on this.

14 posted on 07/06/2023 8:31:51 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson