Posted on 06/30/2023 7:13:11 AM PDT by Whiskered Logic
"The Supreme Court ruled Friday that Colorado cannot require an evangelical Christian web designer to provide same-sex wedding websites that she argued was in violation of her conscience.
The court found that the state’s anti-discrimination law violates Lorie Smith’s free speech rights under the First Amendment by demanding that she create same-sex wedding websites if she wants to do so for opposite-sex unions.
The decision narrows states’ ability to apply public accommodation laws to artists, dealing a significant blow to LGBTQ advocates."
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
1st Student Loan case = NO STANDING.
“Finally. Is this a blanket principle now, or just narrowly applying to this merchant?”
It is a landmark, wide reaching decision.
Thank you Donald Trump, still winning 3 years later. Finally the “conservatives” are acting that way.
“...a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class...”
The protected class would have been served if they didn’t demand the glorification of homosexuality. It was the queer freaks themselves that instigated the denial of service. If they asked for a normal website, they would have been served that request. The public must impose limits to homosexual depravity. This is a start.
No to loan forgiveness !
The left, as usual, will ignore this ruling. And those tasked with enforcing the laws and constitutional freedom will enable this lawbreaking with impunity.
Religious affiliation is or was a protected class.
We'll see. Sorry about my pessimism, but I've been kicked into the dirt too many times over the past two decades to be sure.
I like the result but it is troubling the justices refuse to ground the holding on the free exercise of religion clause as well as freedom of speech.
If Scotus didn’t believe protected classes were constitutional they’d have said so by now.
BREAKING!
Student loan forgiveness BS just shot down too!
There is no loan forgiveness. That is language contro
The process to which you refer is contract nullification and voiding.
If student loan contracts can be nullified, there are no contracts anywhere
What did they come up with as a workarou d or whatever? I missed it.
“I thought cases like this had already been resolved when the “bake the cake” Nazis lost.”
Hell, they even left that one half undone. As soon as the baker got home from that win, a tranny asked for a transition cake. Like blue frosting over pink cake. So you see a blue cake, and cut a slice and discover it’s actually pink on the inside. Get it?... heavy stuff. Of course he refused and Colorado started their next case against him.
So the baker who tookk the bake the cake case to the USSC, was immediately hit with a new bake the pervert cake lawsuit by the State of Colorado.
Why do three female Supreme Court justices hate Christians? That’s disturbing.
Sorry officer, but drinking budlight to excess is required to benefit a constitutionally protected class.
+1
Abominationables are not a protected class
The wise Latina.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.