To: Mariner
“universal benefits of considering race”
Otherwise known as unconstitutional
2 posted on
06/29/2023 4:42:07 PM PDT by
struggle
To: struggle
Hard to believe Jackson can make such judgements. Just a few months age she did not have a clue how to define a woman. Dumber than a box of rocks.
18 posted on
06/29/2023 4:53:15 PM PDT by
chopperk
( C)
Race consciousness is anyone promoting skin color must have preferential treatment.
Color blindness, forced if necessary, is the opposite of her “race consciousness” BS. She is the racist.
To: struggle
She’s not considering race. The plaintiffs were East Asian, a different race is it not? She only wants to consider color.
To: struggle
“universal benefits of considering race”
Remember when every business made it a point to say that they were equal opportunity and didn't take race into consideration? Turns out, they were racists too apparently.
How awful these people are.
39 posted on
06/29/2023 5:19:57 PM PDT by
Antoninus
(Republicans are all honorable men.)
To: struggle
This is coming from a person that can’t define her gender?
68 posted on
06/29/2023 7:27:54 PM PDT by
kempster
(w President of all time.)
To: struggle
“universal benefits of considering race” I think I can live without my share of those "universal benefits."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson