Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rejects affirmative action at colleges, says schools can't consider race in admission
CNBC ^ | 29 June 2023 | Dan Mangan

Posted on 06/29/2023 7:16:30 AM PDT by zeestephen

The Supreme Court ruled that the affirmative action admission policies of Harvard and the University of North Carolina, which gave weight to a would-be student's race, are unconstitutional.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1619project; abortion; affirmativeaction; blackkk; blackliesmanors; blackliesmatter; blacklivesmatter; blm; criticalracetheory; crt; plannedparenthood; righttolife; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

1 posted on 06/29/2023 7:16:30 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Finally!

L


2 posted on 06/29/2023 7:17:23 AM PDT by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Good news, but schools will find a way to end-run this ruling. Abolish all standardized tests. Count the number of apostrophes and hyphens in names. Assign admission essays explaining how tough life was in the ghetto without a daddy present.


3 posted on 06/29/2023 7:18:24 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (I don’t like to think before I say something...I want to be just as surprised as everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

YAY!! At least until I read the details. Hoping there’s no “devil” in there.


4 posted on 06/29/2023 7:18:49 AM PDT by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA. -PRO-MAX’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

I know the liberals will squeal about this.


5 posted on 06/29/2023 7:19:34 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Good news, but schools will find a way to end-run this ruling.

Fine, it will open them up to lawsuits and drain their multi million dollar endowments.

6 posted on 06/29/2023 7:20:55 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

So it will no longer be official policy but no doubt will remain their practice


7 posted on 06/29/2023 7:21:11 AM PDT by william clark (A man who is unwilling to be proven wrong has little regard for truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

After over 30 years of rejecting the most qualified students for Med School.


8 posted on 06/29/2023 7:21:26 AM PDT by G Larry (It is RACIST to impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants by importing Cheap ILLEGAL Labor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

At least 40 years late on these rulings and doubtless now colleges will do every single last thing they can to keep racially discriminating without officially admitting they are....y’know.....racially discriminating, but it will take several more rounds of rulings followed by lawsuits and some hefty damage awards handed out to White and Asian students who will continue to be discriminated against but who knows? Maybe in a decade or so the racial discrimination can at least be pruned back - a little.


9 posted on 06/29/2023 7:22:18 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

LIVE LINK to opinion:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_hgdj.pdf


10 posted on 06/29/2023 7:22:18 AM PDT by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA. -PRO-MAX’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Finally


11 posted on 06/29/2023 7:22:28 AM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

woo hoo - to end discrimination by discriminating is one of those headscratching leftie logic points that has been so hard to live with. yes they’ll try to get around it, but they should beware of being recorded as they plot to do so. lawsuits will ensue. for now, it’s a great day!


12 posted on 06/29/2023 7:22:39 AM PDT by avital2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

The Left will be reeing loudly.


13 posted on 06/29/2023 7:22:53 AM PDT by cdcdawg (Our empire of sodomy is failing as it should. How else could it go? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: william clark
So it will no longer be official policy but no doubt will remain their practice

Fine, it will open them up to lawsuits and drain their multi million dollar endowments.

14 posted on 06/29/2023 7:22:56 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: william clark

As I understand, there are some subjective criteria used in admissions decisions, and some of those could be more prominent.

For example, they might admit more from certain disadvantaged backgrounds, regardless of race and ethnicity, and use such plans to admit more minority group members. But they would say they aren’t using racial criteria, they are using criteria which apply to everyone.


15 posted on 06/29/2023 7:24:16 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Once again, THANK YOU, President Trump!


16 posted on 06/29/2023 7:24:30 AM PDT by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

6-3 decision:

ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which THOMAS,
ALITO, GORSUCH, KAVANAUGH, and BARRETT, JJ., joined.

THOMAS, J., filed a concurring opinion. GORSUCH, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which THOMAS, J., joined. KAVANAUGH, J., filed a concurring opinion.

SOTOMAYOR, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KAGAN, J., joined, and
in which JACKSON, J., joined as it applies to No. 21–707.

JACKSON, J., filed a dissenting opinion in No. 21–707, in which SOTOMAYOR and KAGAN, JJ., joined.

JACKSON, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case in No. 20–1199.


17 posted on 06/29/2023 7:24:32 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg

“reeing”?

Hmmm, “screaming”? Yep.
“peeing”...probably that, too, and right in their pants. But quietly.


18 posted on 06/29/2023 7:24:38 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (I don’t like to think before I say something...I want to be just as surprised as everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Wow...there’s going to be a lot of happy Asians that’s for sure.


19 posted on 06/29/2023 7:25:21 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

And find away around it


20 posted on 06/29/2023 7:25:28 AM PDT by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson