BLM Gives Americans 15 More Days To Comment On New Land Grab Rule, But Won’t Show Up To Hear Their Concerns

Federalist, ^ | JUNE 19, 2023 | Tristan Justice

[MeneMeneTekelUpharsin]

The federal agencies are literally running the country.

[cuz1961]

Kings forest

I made that observation to my bosses at both the usfs and blm regarding charging campground fees,,,,

,,. They were not amused.

Probably why I was never able to progress beyond n.t.e.180’s .

../-/

[Justa]

PPL should call their Representatives and demand they cut their funding. They’ll listen to that.

[sauropod]

Ping to those that may still be interested in this sort of thing.

[sauropod]

Isn’t it though?

[AuntB]

The hits just keep coming!

Thanks for the ping, sauropod.

I’m too old to face down federal agents and violent envirofreaks. Can’t take a punch anymore!

[Organic Panic]

Let me guess. Government grants to “charities” to pay for “conservation leases”

[ridesthemiles]

I think they CONTROL IT-—THEY DON’T OWN IT & THEY DO NOT PAY ANY TAXES ON IT.

Nevada has over 80% of the land mass controlled by the Feds-—with NO taxes.

[CedarDave]

See also:

Contentious committee hearing on BLM proposed rule, support of HR 3397 and

New BLM Rules On ‘Conservation Leases’ Will Fundamentally Transform Public Land Management

NM list PING!

I may not PING for all New Mexico articles. To see New Mexico articles by topic click here: New Mexico Topics

To see NM articles by keyword, click here: New Mexico Keyword

To see the NM Message Page, click here: New Mexico Messages

(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for FR member use; its use in the News Forum should not be for trivial or inconsequential posts. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
(For ABQ Journal articles requiring a subscription, you are allowed a number of free article views.)

[Wuli]

Cut the national debt. Sell all federal lands not now in specific use for military lands, other federal structures, existing minerals, mining and lumber leases, or national parks. Give away only now existing “conservation” sites to the states, for them to keep as is under their authority and care, or otherwise do with as they wish.

[13foxtrot]

Progressives are doing everything they can to eliminate rural commercial viability.

They want to force everyone to move into high-density housing in the cities while turning the rural wild areas into playgrounds for the rich.

Also, eliminating grazing lands (e.g., open range leases) will remove natural beef from the diet of dirty commoners and make it luxury item for the elite. The poors can eat vat grown meat or plant based protein.

[george76]

Kill off family ranchers, then no affordable - free range - food.

[13foxtrot]

Kill off family ranchers, then no affordable - free range - food.

Yep. That is the point. The elite will have their Waygu beef. wild copper river salmon, live cooked lobster, and so on, because they will be able to afford it. The rest of us can eat bugs.

[oldbrowser]

The Federal Govt. does not own the land. They are just managing it on behalf of the American people.

Which they are entirely unqualified to do.

[Wallace T.]

There have been times, under the younger Bush and Trump, when the GOP controlled the House, the Senate, and the Presidency. Yet no serious move was made to return BLM and National Forest land back to the states. Perhaps both Presidents had more important things to attend to, but the Senate and House leadership did absolutely nothing.