Posted on 05/29/2023 3:39:38 AM PDT by CFW
[M]edia polling from Harvard-Harris showing that Americans hold almost diametrically opposing viewpoints from those that news corporations predominantly broadcast as the official "truth."
Americans have correctly concluded that [with the "Russia Hoax" and suppressing reported influence peddling in Hunter Biden's laptop ] journalists and spies advanced a "fraud" on voters as part of an effort to censor a damaging story and "help Biden win." Nevertheless, The New York Times and The Washington Post have yet to return the Pulitzer Prizes they received for reporting totally discredited "fake news."
"Under the current approach to journalism, it is the New York Times that receives a Pulitzer for a now debunked Russian collusion story rather than the New York Post for a now proven Hunter Biden laptop story." — Professor Jonathan Turley, George Washington University Law School, Twitter, May 15, 2023.
(Excerpt) Read more at gatestoneinstitute.org ...
I was recently re-reading “The Great War and Modern Memory” by Paul Fussell and he mentioned that during WWI the press published a lot of propaganda and lies. Like, the Battle of the Somme went well for the British. (It didn’t.) The men in the trenches knew that the press was full of crap and after the war, respect for the press took a long time to recover.
I think that, today, all of our institutions have suffered a loss of respect and I don’t know when they will recover. Who believes the government? The media? The doctors? They all only care about manipulating people.
 "Under the current approach to journalism, it is the New York Times that receives a Pulitzer for a now debunked Russian collusion story rather than the New York Post for a now proven Hunter Biden laptop story." Well, this is certainly not the first time the NYT won a Pulitzer for a fake Russian news story, witness Uncle Walter and his contributions to the annals of journalism.
 "Under the current approach to journalism, it is the New York Times that receives a Pulitzer for a now debunked Russian collusion story rather than the New York Post for a now proven Hunter Biden laptop story." Well, this is certainly not the first time the NYT won a Pulitzer for a fake Russian news story, witness Uncle Walter and his contributions to the annals of journalism.
Enforcement by private entities has already effectively ended free speech. This just makes it official.
Well, as Mao noted, all political power emanates from the barrel of a gun. So, get buying, folks.
Once upon a time, people saw that the First Amendment read, “Congress shall make no law ...”.
But then it became interpreted more broadly, and people decided that no level of government should censor Free Speech.
But the whole game fell part when the Authoritarians realized that private entities could freely punish any speech or religious feelings. All dissent can be silenced, if you can get companies to do it.
A fatal flaw.
A fatal flaw.
\/
Speaking of...
Giving corporations the legal fiction of personhood
was another.
Corporations were then able to gain.
the financial edge over human citizens.
p
America died under a Republican prez during covid. People lost their jobs for non compliance/ disagreement.
Not dead yet. Severely wounded. But the Democrats are doing what they can to rape, pillage & burn what remains
.
the official "truth."
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time."
Poor Jon, he's a red-pilled liberal who fears for his money if he comes out as a conservative. He actually believes anyone puts any credence into a "Pulitzer" or the "NYT", probably dreams of winning the first one and being featured for the win in the latter. WAKE THE F-CK UP TURLEY, stop wasting our time.
There are no limits to tyranny...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.