Good news. Thanks.
Pervy TV?
Yeah, nothing could possibly go wrong.
Just in time for the promised “Uke counteroffensive” NATO escalations. What could go wrong?
The United States has six nuclear bases in five European nations, so what’s wrong with this?
The Russians cant wait to nuke someone. It’s all they ever talk about.
They are like six year olds. I hope they get their drunk butts pushed back a lot this summer.
This will actually be problematic for Russia. They’ll need to establish substantial security as there are many saboteurs in Belarus. There also has to be substantially increased logistics and a secure communications system so the weapons can be reliably activated or deactivated (by their operators.) This move increases the risks of Russia losing a weapon without increasing their utility by one bit. The weapons are no more useful in Belarus than they would be at a more secure location in Russia. This is all about politics and waving the nuclear flag without making actual threats.
Mr. Budanov, Intel Branch of the Ministry of Defense, Ukraine, is a bit of a loose cannon.
Volodymyr Zelensky and Ukraine will be fortunate to hang on to how much land and water that Ukraine currently can - using its present resources to maintain the frontlines.
Moscow can cut roadways and rail traffic between Ukraine and other countries, but Moscow has held back from constant, heavy bombardment of those logistics avenues.
Ukraine has plenty of targets to hit within Ukraine’s territory that Russia now occupies, without adventures beyond Ukraine’s borders.
Ukraine needs thousands of trucks/vehicles that each mount one of the following types of weapons:
- mortar
- multiple rocket tube launcher
- SPG-9
That, because Ukraine needs to be able to lay down a lot of suppressive bombardment.
And that, cannot be accomplished with glamorous F-16 fighter jets.
And, Ukraine does not, and will likely not, have enough tanks (nor heavy-to-middle weight armor), nor field artillery pieces to provide the necessary bombardment offense to recover all of its territory lost to Russian aggression.
I’d bet my left tricycle that more than half of Russia’s nuclear stockpile is behind in its maintenance and unusable.
Knowing the USSR’s penchant for deception, if Pootie-Poot goes so far as to advertise to the world that his army is neglected and underskilled (= Ukraine), what are the odds he’s still paying full fare for maintenance of his nuclear weapons, which no one not in the program could know the truth of? He’s just the sort of lying so-and-so who would dare the world to call his bluff.
So, this is what you want for anyone that opposes the proxy war in Ukraine? At least, you’re being upfront about it.
Also the reason why the US withdrew from the INF treaty in 2018 under Trump was because Russia was breaking it.