Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eviction bans remain in California more than 3 years into the pandemic
Fox ^ | 5-8-23 | Will Parker

Posted on 05/08/2023 12:29:05 PM PDT by dynachrome

A handful of California cities are still enforcing laws that protect tenants from eviction or rent increases, extending pandemic-era policies that most of the country wound down more than a year ago.

The San Francisco board of supervisors voted in March to maintain a local eviction ban for unpaid rent until at least the summer. In Oakland and Berkeley, similar laws will also run into the summer months. The city of Los Angeles, meanwhile, extended a prohibition on evicting tenants for having unauthorized pets or occupants in their apartments. It also renewed a rent freeze on rent-controlled apartments until next year.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxbusiness.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; evictions; rentals
"Unpaid back rent across greater Los Angeles could exceed $1 billion, according to estimates from research group National Equity Atlas, which based the figures on Census surveys. "

And never will be paid.

1 posted on 05/08/2023 12:29:05 PM PDT by dynachrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

The so-called pandemic was just an excuse for government to wage war against the citizenry.


2 posted on 05/08/2023 12:32:18 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

California is undergoing a revolution of sorts where the very notion of private property is being challenged. San Frantoilet is a case in point.


3 posted on 05/08/2023 12:34:37 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Yet another reason why I am glad that we got rid of all of our residential rental properties years ago.


4 posted on 05/08/2023 12:37:37 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy ( Dementia Joe is Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

And that was the original intention. The “moratorium” was opportunistic. It used the excuse of covid to illegally break a legal contract.

Their goal is to force land owners to rent FREE to people who then trash the place and will never pay.

Private property is the hated entity. They want it ALL owned by the collectivity. It’ll take some time to get there. The folks might realize what’s happening. So they’ll do it a little at a time.


5 posted on 05/08/2023 12:39:52 PM PDT by I want the USA back (No one is assigned sex at birth. One's sex is noted and recorded. My pronouns Haha, hehe, hoho, hoo )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

California rental laws are insane. I just had to evict a transient scammer from my friends apartment. My friend is in the hospital and the scammer took the opportunity to steal his vehicle and credit cards while camped out at the apartment. The cops refused to arrest him because there was evidence the scammer was now receiving mail at the apartment and therefore was a legal “subtenant” even without anything in writing.

Thankfully he voluntarily departed as the eviction would have taken months. And then had the cojones to ask that we save his personal property that he left in the stolen vehicle


6 posted on 05/08/2023 12:41:39 PM PDT by KingofZion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Then they wonder why low cost housing is disappearing.


7 posted on 05/08/2023 12:52:55 PM PDT by Spok (“Winston, how many fingers am I holding up?”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

How many property holders lost their property because they couldn’t make the payments to the lien holders?


8 posted on 05/08/2023 1:23:16 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (It's science and therefore cannot be questioned!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

I was sent a letter on April 7 from the city of Los Angeles that said my rent was stabilized and they wanted to know if my rent was higher then shown in the letter.

I received another letter at the end of the month from the owner for Notice of change of terms of tenancy showing the same rent amount BUT the city raised their fees from $3.61 to $4.44 for Systematic code enforcement surcharge and RSO registration fees.


9 posted on 05/08/2023 2:13:26 PM PDT by minnesota_bound (Need more money to buy everything now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

Rent control?


10 posted on 05/08/2023 3:04:29 PM PDT by dynachrome (“We cannot save Ukraine by dooming the US economy.” Rand Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

“A handful of California cities are still enforcing laws that protect tenants from eviction or rent increases,”

How is this not an unlawful taking? Are landlords in CA brain dead?


11 posted on 05/08/2023 3:31:06 PM PDT by sergeantdave (AI is the next iteration of a copy and paste machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Because of the illegal lockdown. The democrats destroyed 40%+ of the business’s in LA and San Francisco etc. They also stopped rent increases and still are which has to be illegal.


12 posted on 05/08/2023 4:27:39 PM PDT by minnesota_bound (Need more money to buy everything now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson