Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell ordered to pay $5M over debunked 2020 election data
The Hill ^ | 04/20/23 11:58 AM ET

Posted on 04/20/2023 10:02:55 AM PDT by Renfrew

Lindell, who promised to pay the $5 million award to anyone who could debunk his data that purportedly proved election fraud, was ordered to pay the sum by a private arbitrator, who ruled that Robert Zeidman, a software expert, successfully disproved Lindell’s claims.

“Based on the foregoing analysis, Mr. Zeidman performed under the contract,” the ruling said. “He proved the data Lindell LLC provided, and represented reflected information from the November 2020 election, unequivocally did not reflect November 2020 election data.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 00realfreepers; 01seekthetruth; 02notpropaganda; 03reality; 04isaharshteacher; 0realfreepers; 2020; basemntjoedidnt81mil; believeanythingcrowd; biglie; crackhead; electionfraud2020; fakefreepers; fakefrpersluvthehill; fraud; frauddenial; frauddenier; frauddenyingtroll; frauddenyingtrolls; frauddidhappen; lindell; mikelindell; mikeprovenwrong; mypillow; provemikewrong; qtards; renfool; renfrew; thebiglie; thehill; toomanyfkefreepers; voterfraud; wentfullqtard; xianidiot; zotthefrauddeniers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-150 next last
To: DesertRhino

“Not a doubt in my mind these voting machines are crooked, and switch votes.”

That’s not the issue here.


81 posted on 04/20/2023 12:21:27 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

I was talking of Fox news.

And no, I skimmed the article.


82 posted on 04/20/2023 12:23:02 PM PDT by redgolum (We are not going to make it, are we. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dpetty121263

“It takes months to determine computer fraud as I have worked in the IT Security field for over 20 years and it can’t be determined in short order.”

It doesn’t take months to determine whether a file that someone claims is captured network traffic actually is such a thing or not. If it does take you months to determine that, then I’d question your capabilities.


83 posted on 04/20/2023 12:23:10 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

This isn’t a fine.

Lindell offered up a challenge to prove him wrong. Somebody did.


84 posted on 04/20/2023 12:24:05 PM PDT by trustverify0128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pol-92064

“Well Mike never stated how fast he would pay off the $5M”

Absence of him laying out any timeline is just going to be taken as an implicit promise to pay it all at once if the conditions are satisfied.


85 posted on 04/20/2023 12:24:54 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

No, I read about half. Thanks for explaining...it appeared he was fined. Sorry


86 posted on 04/20/2023 12:26:22 PM PDT by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Pol-92064

The arbitration panel would beg to differ. They claim this data analyst complied with the challenge and Lindell has 30 days to pay.


87 posted on 04/20/2023 12:30:02 PM PDT by trustverify0128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

That’s what comes of dealing with Dennis Montgomery.


88 posted on 04/20/2023 12:34:45 PM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
Not true.

Thanks for pointing this out. Obviously the Packet Captures are real, so one of several things must explain the discrepancy: Last once might be a stretch, I'm researching whether the Chinese Empire has new code now. I'm aware safety is not guaranteed but I have done this once before.
89 posted on 04/20/2023 12:35:21 PM PDT by Observator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: notted

“Is it legal to hold a national Republican only pre-election?”

A national election? My bet is no. Elections are run by states.

Who’s going to pay for it?

And why would a Republican-only election give any indication as to what would happen when you let all registered voters participate?


90 posted on 04/20/2023 12:36:33 PM PDT by trustverify0128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JSM_Liberty; DesertRhino

There’s also the technical reason that any programmer can tell you: there’s an upper limit to the size of an integer value that a computer can store, and it’s not really large enough when you talk about the numbers that come up in elections.

However, there is no similar upper limit on floating point numbers (numbers with decimal places). So it’s standard practice in programming, in such a scenario, to store the numbers as floating point numbers, even if no operations that might actually result in needing a decimal are going to be done.


91 posted on 04/20/2023 12:37:07 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The vote-counting machines probably worked just fine. It's just that they were counting many -- probably several million -- ballots that had been cast fraudulently. That's why none of the results changed even with multiple independently conducted recounts.

I've been saying this since November 2020. It's amazing how many people are too dull to figure this out even more than two years later -- while they're still waiting for Sidney Powell to release her stupid "Kracken."

Yep. Once in the batch, always in the batch during recounting. The electronic tabulation was not the problem. I don't even think running the same ballot through multiple times resulted in any count accuracy problems, but that is just my tech self understanding how ballot counting ought to be done and presuming it to be so.

92 posted on 04/20/2023 12:37:28 PM PDT by Religion and Politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
There’s also the technical reason that any programmer can tell you: there’s an upper limit to the size of an integer value that a computer can store, and it’s not really large enough when you talk about the numbers that come up in elections.

However, there is no similar upper limit on floating point numbers (numbers with decimal places). So it’s standard practice in programming, in such a scenario, to store the numbers as floating point numbers, even if no operations that might actually result in needing a decimal are going to be done.


I hope you don't mind me quoting your entire response since your expertise is valuable. I don't have the data base expertise you do, although I do sometimes manage the IT department when the CIO is on vacation.

I always give them the same guidance. Since an INT stores 1 byte (saving a bit for the +/- sign), and a BIGINT is only double that, it's necessary to define most integer sums greater than 32,000 with FLOAT data types.
93 posted on 04/20/2023 12:43:13 PM PDT by Observator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

Lindell got these from Dennis Montgomery who previously scammed the CIA and Joe Arpaio.


94 posted on 04/20/2023 12:43:31 PM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

The data packets were MS Word files containing a bunch of gibberish. The modification dates on the files were from the previous several weeks. That would not be the case if these were real data packets from 2020.


95 posted on 04/20/2023 12:52:30 PM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

they would ban me for calling Hillary oldbag.


96 posted on 04/20/2023 12:59:06 PM PDT by VAFreedom (Wuhan Pneumonia-Made by CCP, Copyright Xi Jingping)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Observator
As Mike was revealing the Packet Captures to the room, the camera started shaking and Mike yelled "WE'RE UNDER ATTACK!!"

I watched the Cyber Symposium and don't remember that happening at all.

I do remember Dennis Montgomery not showing up due to health reasons.

When the smoke cleared, the Packet Captures had been replaced by the gibberish we see now.

And how precisely does that happen? How are they "replaced"?

Lindell did some jackassin' and couldn't back it up.

All three arbitrators ruled in favor of Zeidman.

Pay up. Mike.

And you still haven't produced the packet captures.

97 posted on 04/20/2023 1:10:11 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Coronal
Lindell got these from Dennis Montgomery who previously scammed the CIA and Joe Arpaio.

Don't forget the parts that "Mary Fanning" and Phil Waldron played in all this.

Lindell was not well served by his "advisors"

98 posted on 04/20/2023 1:11:43 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Observator
Due to the Threat Pattern, Lindell could not share the real data with Zeidman out of fear for his life.

Code for "Lindell knows he got bad data and is making 'stuff up"

99 posted on 04/20/2023 1:13:06 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

He found the files in somebody’s medicine chest.


100 posted on 04/20/2023 1:13:39 PM PDT by HYPOCRACY (This is the dystopian future we've been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson