Posted on 04/15/2023 2:06:28 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
They, the CIA, wouldn’t hire homosexuals/lesbians or other perverts because it was both a moral character issue and also a blackmail issue.
BUD share prices peaked in 2016 at $131 and has been on a downward trend since then. BUD is currently trading at $64.
As Steve Bannon says: “We are hearing the primal scream of a dying regime”.
BUD appears to want to hasten its demise by promoting the trans agenda.
BUD reminds me of Bed Bath Beyond who was in financial trouble and then put the nail in their coffin by banning MY PILLOW from their stores.
Deep state hates normal?
Bud, BathHouse, and Beyond?
I knew the culinary institute of America was behind all this.
I doubt he’s worried at all.
________________________________________________
I’m sure his company will get some kind of corporate tax credit for participating in “diverse and inclusive” social-engineering so dear to Left-wing politicos.
“They might have lost a million or two in sales but the six billion was stock value which is not anywhere near the same thing.”
I hope it was more than one or two million in lost sales; but you are right the fluctuation in share price may bounce right back up.
However, sales drives revenue; revenue drives profit; and profit drives share price. This thing is hardly over.
Except a CEO has one job...and that’s to protect and grow shareholder value.
Just another Agency psychops. Their mission is to shape the public mindset visa-a visa corrupt government objectives. Understand what they are doing is not being done in our best interests.
The sales numbers have yet to show up.
Talk to us all around Labor Day-—after a summer of picnics & baseball, etc.
If the Agency was that concerned about moral character, at least a quarter of the DO would have been canned. OS had more success with the blackmail threat excuse until the early ‘90’s. It’s all over now.
Well not every Directorate had the same moral character requirements. The DO needed people who could do deep cover and lie convincingly. However none of the DO’s wanted people who could lie convincingly to the Agency itself. They wanted people in most cases with a moral character that had a high guilt complex and make it more uncomfortable to try lying. The poly’s would pick up on it. Not a guarantee of lying, but something they’d have to focus on.
The DO personnel kids’ behavior reflected them. It was probably a mistake having an entire DO family PCS. Those kids were usually the biggest screwups because their parents treated them, and lied to them, like their assets and everyone else. They were some of the Station Security Officer’s biggest headaches and God forbid if the COS’ kids were delinquents. I saw it happen at one Station.
Yeah, its really not the kids’ faults. They can’t really be told whats going on. Even the spouses dont get the full picture.
WOW and they THINK being former CIA is going to help this mess you can’t make this stuff up!! I guess they don’t realize how much we distrust the CIA & FBI!! Keep digging AB, LMAO!!!
What I wanna know is this: the company says in their “applogy” that they “didn’t know” about the cans. Do you have any idea how much reconfiguration the can making machines must go through to produce a new version? That doesn’t happen without approval from the highest in command. And those cans were mass produced, I’m sure, not just the one. Hopefully those are sitting in the warehouse rotting.
Quit reading here, ”… honer his first 365 days…”
If content creators want people to read their stuff, write like English is your first language and if you can’t afford an editor, at least give it to someone else to proofread before posting. Some articles are completely useless because of sloppy wordsmything or grammatical mistakes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.