Skip to comments.
NOAA Study: Atmosphere Warming At Half The Rate Predicted By Climate Models
climatechangedispatch.com ^
| APR 13, 2023
| BY ROSS MCKITRICK
Posted on 04/14/2023 11:19:44 AM PDT by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: Red Badger
2
posted on
04/14/2023 11:21:30 AM PDT
by
Chode
(there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
To: Red Badger
"Trust the science" says a 20 year old who can't even finish high school.
To: Red Badger
Algore and Greta are deeply saddened.
4
posted on
04/14/2023 11:26:26 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
To: Red Badger
5
posted on
04/14/2023 11:27:37 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: Red Badger
Global warming analysis always has a ‘start point’ in the recent past, over the last 40 years or so.
Go back another half-blink of time, it all falls apart.
This planet was 3-5C WARMER during the Roman empire period, temps lasted about 1000 years, until about 450AD, according to things like tree rings, discovery of ‘warm weather’ plants in cold areas, and other hard and “un-fakeable” evidence. That’s triple the increase of temps the alarmists tell us will cause the planet to ‘die’. Then we had a Maunder min. period of low sun activity, dropping global temps to well below today’s averages by 1-2C.
But for the alarmists, planetary climate history starts 40 years ago, as it must for the minimal changes to show up and not be overcome by far larger swings over the last 5,000 years.
6
posted on
04/14/2023 11:32:22 AM PDT
by
TonyinLA
(I don't have sufficient information to formulate an reasoned opinion said no lefty ever.)
To: Steely Tom
Atmosphere Warming At Half The Rate Predicted By Climate Models“
So now we have 20 years instead of 10?
7
posted on
04/14/2023 11:32:40 AM PDT
by
gibsonguy
To: Red Badger
Of course. CO2 can only absorb a limited amount of heat. The rest goes off into space.
8
posted on
04/14/2023 11:32:49 AM PDT
by
rfp1234
(E Porcibus Unum )
To: TonyinLA
Those who presume to be our leaders have no use for facts. Quit rocking the boat.
9
posted on
04/14/2023 11:34:02 AM PDT
by
GingisK
To: Red Badger
10
posted on
04/14/2023 11:37:42 AM PDT
by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: TonyinLA
This planet was 3-5C WARMER during the Roman empire period TOGA!...TOGA!...TOGA!...TOGA!..........................
11
posted on
04/14/2023 11:38:45 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: TonyinLA
Agreed. There's a reason the Roman Warm Period is often referred to as the "Roman Climate Optimum". Not only was it warmer than now, it was a good thing for it be warmer.
Instead of hating the Modern Warm Period we should be happy we're in it and hope it gets as high as the Roman Climate Optimum did (which I doubt it will).
12
posted on
04/14/2023 11:41:40 AM PDT
by
Tell It Right
(1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
To: GingisK
I shut down the ignorant sheep in my office a few years ago by reminding them the spot where our office was located was under a mile or two of ice only a few thousand years ago. When I suggested ordinary, natural and inevitable global temp changes is what caused all of that ice to first form and then melt, I only got blank stares.
13
posted on
04/14/2023 11:48:14 AM PDT
by
TonyinLA
(I don't have sufficient information to formulate an reasoned opinion said no lefty ever.)
To: Red Badger
proving yet again how far the IPCC has departed from its original mission of providing objective scientific assessments. Everyone MUST remember - the IPCC is a United Nations body. According to its rules and mandates, it can ONLY collate and collect data and reports approved and provided by member governments.
So if the French or US Governments approve for it a report that says "global warming" is caused by shape-shifting lizard aliens, it must consider that in its reports.
Its a POLITICAL body, not scientific.
14
posted on
04/14/2023 11:53:11 AM PDT
by
PGR88
To: Red Badger
Gosh, whoever would have though at a climate model full of arbitrary variables might not match reality? The LSM will kill this, doesn't fit the past 10 year narrative.
But, the world hears nothing about Arizona temperatures being lower than average almost every day for the past three months?
15
posted on
04/14/2023 11:56:15 AM PDT
by
pfflier
To: Red Badger
4 deg. C warmer -——> GOOD TIMES!
16
posted on
04/14/2023 12:01:01 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: gibsonguy
To: Red Badger
For the troposphere as a whole, they estimate a warming trend of 0.14 C/decade.
So 0.14C per decade is about 2.5 F per century? How much is natural warming versus manmade? What is the process of determining how much is natural variation versus manmade? Most people couldn't tell the difference between 80 and 82.5 F if asked, but the establishment want me to believe that mass extinctions will occur and the earth will burn up? GTFO. Most people dying of weather related incidents freeze to death from exposure. Probably have less of that happening. It is a good thing.
To: crusty old prospector
To: Red Badger
NOAA Study: Atmosphere Warming At Half The Rate Predicted By Climate Models
—
And soon “Atmosphere Warming” will go higher as summer gets in full swing - the atmosphere will boil! Run!
20
posted on
04/14/2023 12:51:50 PM PDT
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson