Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America’s Biggest Adversaries Had A Bad Week: China and Russia both suffered some blows on the foreign policy front.
The Federalist ^ | 04/10/2023 | Helen Raleigh

Posted on 04/10/2023 8:59:43 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

China and Russia, America’s two adversaries, suffered significant blows on the foreign policy front last week.

In Europe, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken joined other allies to welcome Finland as the latest North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member. Finland applied for NATO membership a year ago, prompted by security concerns after Russia invaded Ukraine. According to The Wall Street Journal, Finland adds tremendous value to NATO.

Unlike Germany, Finland already follows NATO’s guidelines by allocating 2 percent of its gross domestic product to military spending, and the nation boasts one of the best-prepared defense forces in Europe. Since Finland shares an 800-mile-long border with Russia, adding Finland allows NATO to double its frontier with Russia, and to get closer to “one of Russia’s most sensitive military outposts, the Kola Peninsula, home to Russia’s Northern Fleet and the majority of its nuclear-powered submarines,” the Journal reports.

Thus, Finland’s NATO membership has substantially affected Russian President Vladimir Putin’s geopolitical ambitions. One of Putin’s top priorities has always been stopping NATO from further expansion. After Russia invaded Ukraine last year, one of the justifications Putin offered was to keep Ukraine outside of NATO. Yet, Putin’s gamble has backfired. He has failed to conquer Ukraine as quickly as he had envisioned, and he is now stuck in a prolonged war. The war has also exposed that Russia’s military is not as mighty as portrayed.

To Putin’s dismay, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine accelerated NATO’s expansion — Finland and Sweden abandoned their neutrality status and applied for NATO membership last year. Russia threatened to retaliate after Finland joined NATO last week. Putin may want to hold off his indignation a bit longer because it is only a matter of time before Sweden becomes a NATO member. Even though Sweden doesn’t share a land border with Russia, the nation has a significant presence in the Baltic Sea.

China and Taiwan

While Putin is furious about Finland’s NATO membership, his pal in Beijing, China’s leader Xi Jinping, also had a bad week.

On Monday, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) announced that the Philippine government had granted the U.S. military four new sites in its country under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Arrangement (EDCA). Among the four recent locations, three are on the main island of Luzon, which is close to Taiwan, and one is in Palawan province in the South China Sea.

In its press release, the DOD explained that having access to these new sites is strategically vital because “In addition to the five existing sites, these new locations will strengthen the interoperability of the U.S. and Philippine Armed Forces and allow us to respond more seamlessly together to address a range of shared challenges in the Indo-Pacific region.”

What the DOD didn’t say, but Beijing and every China observer understand, is that these sites, with their proximity to Taiwan and the South China Sea, will enable the U.S. military to respond quickly in the event of China’s invasion of Taiwan. The Chinese embassy in the Philippines has been very critical of the EDCA and accused it of being part of “U.S. efforts to encircle and contain China through its military alliance with this country.”

But what upset Xi most was Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen’s visit to the U.S. last week. Her meeting with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., was the highest profile for Taiwan’s president on U.S. soil. Nothing irritates the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) more than witnessing Taiwan’s political leaders gaining diplomatic exposure on the world stage. Although the CCP never ruled Taiwan, the party has long insisted that the self-governing island is merely a province of communist China. The CCP vehemently opposes any official interactions of Taiwan’s leaders with the rest of the world because it believes such interactions reinforce the independence movement in Taiwan.

When former U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi visited Taiwan last August, an enraged Beijing launched week-long live-fire drills and sent ballistic missiles over Taiwan, five of which landed in Japanese-controlled water. Beijing issued many warnings this time before McCarthy met with Tsai. But McCarthy let it know he wouldn’t allow the CCP to dictate when and how he interacted with Taiwan’s president.

The day before McCarthy and Tsai’s meeting in California, the People’s Liberation Army’s navy launched another live-fire drill, followed by a joint cruise and patrol operation in the Taiwan Strait. Notably, the Chinese military’s response has been more muted than last year, probably because Xi wanted to act more like a global statesman as he hosted French President Emmanuel Macron in Beijing last week.

Still, Xi was probably seething about Tsai’s warm welcome from McCarthy and his accompanying bipartisan congressional delegation. Yet Xi has only himself to blame for the growing public and political support in the U.S. for Taiwan. China’s rapid military build-up and Xi’s repeated vow not to give up “reuniting” with Taiwan by force have destabilized the region and threatened the security of U.S. allies from South Korea to Japan. The CCP’s political suppression in Hong Kong became a warning to the Taiwanese people and the rest of the world that Beijing had no intention of keeping its treaty promises. Should Taiwan reunite with communist China, the CCP will impose its authoritarian political model on the island as it has done to Hong Kong. Taiwanese people will lose their freedom and democracy. 

Beijing’s cover-up of the Covid-19 outbreak in the early days of the pandemic and later how it stonewalled any effort to uncover the origin of the coronavirus have further eroded communist China’s international standing. Many nations learned from their pandemic experiences that Beijing is an unreliable global health and security partner.

Meanwhile, the Taiwanese government’s successful handling of the pandemic and transparency has won the island many friends and much goodwill. Not surprisingly, government officials from the European Union to the United States have visited Taiwan post-pandemic, defying China’s furious condemnations and threats. Tsai’s high-profile visit to the U.S. last week, especially her meeting with McCarthy on U.S. soil, marked the peak of Taiwan’s diplomatic breakthrough. We could only imagine Xi’s fury.

China and Russia, two of America’s most significant adversaries, had a bad week as they both suffered some blows on the foreign policy front. Yet America cannot afford to sit back and relax. The Biden administration has devoted enormous resources to helping Ukraine defend itself against Russia, while offering the American people no vision of how the Russia-Ukraine war will end.

Should China’s Xi invade Taiwan, something that looks more and more likely as the days go by, the United States will have to face two nuclear powers with two of the largest armies in the world. The Biden administration hasn’t made the case to the American people about what the administration has done to prepare for such a dangerous scenario, what America’s commitment will be, and what strategic goals we hope to achieve.

Rhetoric and hashtags won’t keep either Taiwan or America safe. The lack of plans and communications from the Biden administration is worrisome.


Helen Raleigh, CFA, is an American entrepreneur, writer, and speaker. She's a senior contributor at The Federalist. Her writings appear in other national media, including The Wall Street Journal and Fox News. Helen is the author of several books, including "Confucius Never Said" and “Backlash: How Communist China's Aggression Has Backfired


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: china; finland; foreignpolicy; russia

1 posted on 04/10/2023 8:59:43 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

P


2 posted on 04/10/2023 9:01:21 PM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=40%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well then I guess we are out of the woods now. Whew. Stupid idiots getting paid to sound smart. They act like wars and politics are spectator sports and they are always on the right side.


3 posted on 04/10/2023 11:06:09 PM PDT by webheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webheart

Whew! That was a close one.


4 posted on 04/10/2023 11:23:34 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why should we want to expand NATO’s border with Russia? Neutral buffer states are a good thing. They keep tensions reduced. Eliminating them increases tension. That’s not a wise idea when the other side is the country with the most nuclear weapons on earth.


5 posted on 04/11/2023 4:53:44 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Mitch McConnell is rolling in his grave even before he is dead.


6 posted on 04/11/2023 6:07:13 AM PDT by Candor7 ( ( Ask not for whom THE Trump trolls...He trolls for thee!)<img src=""width=500></img>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

grabbing at straws are ya, the US influence is falling apart world wide because of our seeding wars world wide, gig is up.


7 posted on 04/11/2023 6:30:56 AM PDT by norsky ( <P> <a href= > <hi/a> <P><img src=" "width=500"></img>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

Neutral buffer states tend not to be stable in the long term as they basically exist on the acquiescence of the major powers they sit between. While it is not uncommon for them to last for a few generations, eventually one or the other of the major powers typically absorbs the buffer state. This can be due to any combination of the following reasons: Balance of power between the major powers has shifted; political shift within the buffer state; diplomatic and spy skulduggery; policy shift within one of the major powers.


8 posted on 04/11/2023 6:35:18 AM PDT by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fraxinus

I dunno. It worked pretty well for Austria. It wasn’t bad for Yugoslavia either (though that frankenstein country broke down later because it was never a natural grouping of people to begin with).


9 posted on 04/11/2023 7:27:35 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fraxinus

That was basically the problem with the breakup of Austria-Hungary after WWI.

All of these small states were between Germany and the Soviet Union, so they each had to choose a side, or have it chosen for them.


10 posted on 04/11/2023 7:29:34 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

Why should we want to expand NATO’s border with Russia? Neutral buffer states are a good thing. They keep tensions reduced. Eliminating them increases tension. That’s not a wise idea when the other side is the country with the most nuclear weapons on earth.


You’ve got it backwards. Tensions will increase because Making Russia Great Again will give the Kremlin more resources to use in their attacks on us. Such as their documented funding of the whack job “environmentalists”. It will also reduce US influence in Europe and restrict access to those markets. That means fewer export related jobs and income here in the US.

Nothing good will come to Americans from weakly surrendering to Russian blackmail. Guaranteed.


11 posted on 04/11/2023 8:04:26 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

GMAB. The Russians funded Gaia Worshipers because they want us to pump less oil to compete with them and they knew we were foolish enough to listen to Gaia Worshipers. As for those countries being in NATO that doesn’t give us more access to their markets. They were trading with us anyway. NATO is not a trading block.


12 posted on 04/11/2023 8:10:52 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

As for those countries being in NATO that doesn’t give us more access to their markets. They were trading with us anyway. NATO is not a trading block.


Sure it does. NATO is as much an economic alliance as a military one. Trump campaigned for American LNG to replace Russian energy in Europe. That’s happening now because those are allied countries and they are seeking reliable sources of energy.


13 posted on 04/11/2023 8:23:57 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

No its not. NATO is not a trading block. We have no more access to the German market than we do the Austrian market.


14 posted on 04/11/2023 8:36:15 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

“adding Finland allows NATO to double its frontier with Russia, and to get closer to “one of Russia’s most sensitive military outposts, the Kola Peninsula,”

She should have looked at the map. The current Norwegian border is still closer to Murmansk.


15 posted on 04/11/2023 10:28:01 AM PDT by rxh4n1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

At least France has our back. /s


16 posted on 04/11/2023 4:15:57 PM PDT by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird; SeekAndFind; Fraxinus; dfwgator; lodi90; dennisw; SpeedyInTexas; Monterrosa-24; ...

Finland has already found out the fate of neutral buffer states when aggressors get moving. They are already well armed and well trained, kind of a Switzerland of the north. I have just finished watching 2 long videos on the significant qualities that Finland brings to NATO, quite aside from the 800 mile border that Putin will now have to worry more about.

1) Finland is not far from Russia’s second city, St. Petersburg/Leningrad. Probably some of the missile systems we have recently sent to Ukraine could hit it easily.

2) There is a very narrow piece of land between Russia controlled Kaliningrad and Belarus that is the only land route from central Europe to northern Baltic Europe. Finland improves the access.

3) There is a Baltic Sea island, Gotland, which was referred to as a fixed aircraft carrier as it has so many NATO and other planes there, which now have additional protection from Finish access.

4) The Cola (Kola?) Peninsula in far northeast Russia is a crucial piece of land. It is bordered on the west by both Finland and Norway. It has the critical ice free port of Murmansk which houses Russia’s nuclear submarine fleet. From Murmansk these subs can travel west to the US east coast, and east to Alaska. It also has a large concentration of ICBM silos and related nuclear infrastructure.

5) The Cola Peninsula is reached from Russia by a single highway and rail line. For about 500 miles it runs parallel to Finland at about 100 miles distance which makes it quite vulnerable to Finland.

6) Finland has been spending the NATO required 2% of GDP for a while and has an extremely well equipped and trained military.

I really don’t believe that NATO has aggressive intent toward Russia. Since Putin and other Russians do seem to very much have such aggressive intent, they probably find it hard to imagine that NATO DOES NOT!!


17 posted on 04/28/2023 4:07:36 PM PDT by gleeaikin (Question authority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson