Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inventing a Law to Destroy a Political Opponent
The American Spectator ^ | April 1, 2023, 10:50 PM | SHMUEL KLATZKIN April 1, 2023, 10:50 PM

Posted on 04/02/2023 11:15:37 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

The indictment of Donald Trump brings into sharp focus two great constitutional principles. Great in that they are foundational — without them, whatever edifice one may build above is compromised and will sooner or later collapse.

The first of these principles is that voiced now by the legion enemies of Donald Trump. It had been voiced earlier by the legion enemies of Hillary Clinton and today by the legion enemies of Joe Biden. It is the idea, traced quite properly by Fortescue back to Biblical law, that everyone, even the king, is answerable to the law of God. The English Common Law tradition, also quite properly, sees itself as sanctioned by God’s law and assented to willingly by the people to bring peaceable governance to the nation. Thus, Magna Carta and the Petition of Right, establishing constitutional limits to royal power, and explicitly restricting the king’s power. All are under the law.

Presidents in office have an immunity from prosecution as did kings. But presidents have so only while in office, and once outside it, whether by conviction on articles of impeachment or simply at the end of their elected term, those immunities disappear.

The public grasps the unfairness of a two-tiered legal system. If, for the same action forbidden by law, some people go to prison while others enjoy their liberty, corruption has taken hold. The stench of this corruption is what gave power to the cry of “drain the swamp!” — the apprehension of tens of millions of Americans that powerful elites at the center of American government held one law for themselves and an entirely different one for those they called deplorables and clingers, whom those elites thought (and still think) need to be put in their place by their betters.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: harassment; lawfare; persecution; trump

1 posted on 04/02/2023 11:15:37 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

And that’s exactly what it is


2 posted on 04/02/2023 11:16:57 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They need this to gag him and prevent him from running for president with this indictment. If he comes through with shining colors they will start a world war to keep them in their seats and cancel the election in 2024


3 posted on 04/02/2023 11:20:12 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

This is a proof-of-concept.

If it works, it will be used against all Republican candidates who are not part of the Swamp.


4 posted on 04/02/2023 11:21:42 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Biden ran from his basement.

President Trump may have to run from a jail cell.


5 posted on 04/02/2023 11:48:45 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This is equal to a declaration of war.


6 posted on 04/02/2023 11:59:24 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
beria-show-me-the-man
7 posted on 04/02/2023 12:23:27 PM PDT by Westbrook (The Democrats are wizards at two things: Finding votes and losing evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This is a proof-of-concept.


It was already exercised her in MO with the prosecution of Republican governor Greitens by a Soros-backed St. Louis D.A. She first charged him with abusing his hairdresser, and when that fell apart, she charged him with improper use of a database in his campaign. He resigned as a result. Later found to have grossly abused her office, she still holds office.

They pulled the same thing off in Texas against the then Speaker of the House. And Sarah Palin was also hounded out of office by ‘law fare’.

The reality is that there are jurisdictions like NYC, DC, Atlanta where any Republican accused of any crime is pretty likely to be convicted. Post a meme about voting for Hillary by cell phone and you’re looking at 10 years.


8 posted on 04/02/2023 12:27:21 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu

Anyone have and can post pictures of armed average men holding the Land management and fbi at bay with weapons. Even then they put at least one behind bars and one under 6 feet of dirt.


9 posted on 04/02/2023 12:41:53 PM PDT by wgmalabama (Censored!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu
In Texas, Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle (D) indicted House Majority Leader Tom Delay (R) for a campaign violation that was not a law at the time the act took place.

It didn't matter to Earle because he knew that the House GOP had a party rule that leadership must step down if under an ethics investigation, and so his goal was to use the Republicans' rules against them.


Tom Delay's Mug Shot

-PJ

10 posted on 04/02/2023 1:11:52 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Was he the one who asked, “Where do I go to get my reputation back?”


11 posted on 04/02/2023 1:19:24 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu
No.

That was New York City's Raymond Donovan, who was President Ronald Reagan's Secretary of Labor in his first term.

A Bronx grand jury indicted Donovan on larceny and fraud charges related to a city project to construct a subway line extension. A jury eventually acquitted Donovan, but he had to resign from the Reagan administration after being indicted.

Another NYC DA taking out a high-profile Republican working for an "evil" Republican president.

-PJ

12 posted on 04/02/2023 1:26:02 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Look, I don’t know what’s in the indictment. And the process is political, beyond a doubt.

But subornation of perjury and tax evasion are real crimes, and if (IF) the State can prove them, this is a real problem.


13 posted on 04/02/2023 1:29:29 PM PDT by Jim Noble (You have sat too long for any good you have been doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
But subornation of perjury and tax evasion are real crimes, and if (IF) the State can prove them, this is a real problem.

IF I can prove you're a pedophile human-trafficker, you have a real problem, and I have as much proof you're a pedophile human-trafficker as Bragg does for "subornation of perjury and tax evasion."

As a matter of fact, there is a lot of evidence Bragg "suborned perjury" by putting a convicted perjurer on the stand in the grand jury "ham sandwich" trial.

Not only that, it appears Bragg misused federal funds for the "investigation."

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/03/31/bragg-confirms-federal-funds-used-in-trump-probe-bolstering-gop-investigation/

According to Alan Dershowitz, this is the worst example he has ever seen of 'prosecutorial abuse of discretion.'

https://youtu.be/-N0_pF6K-uI

I am just curious. Where did you get your law degree?

14 posted on 04/02/2023 1:57:20 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Needed from the RNC: a thorough, but understandable, white paper discussing the charges and why they aren’t crimes under our Constitution.


15 posted on 04/02/2023 2:35:49 PM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The democrat party has made their most dangerous moves they won’t enjoy their times in court or in jail.

They will lose a lot of their base on their actions.


16 posted on 04/03/2023 9:54:18 AM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson