The same can be said about the FIB's scheme to deceive the public by knowingly mischaracterizing the Hunter Biden scandal as "Russian misinformation" at a critical moment before the 2016 election.
Amanda Carpenter...
Where have I heard that name before???
The (great) comment on your post #2 suckered me into clicking the article’s link.
Wow!
This whole site is (no other way to accurately describe it) anti-Trump porn. I feel dirty just READING it; I need a shower . . .
So long, Amanda Carpenter; it was good to not know you.
Since Cohen’s attorney’s letter, revealed yesterday, shows that President Trump had no part in that, then this article is baseless accusations.
President Trump has always said this was extortion against a high profile public person, something that happens to them all the time. Iirc, he did have an occasion to be at some event, the same as this porn movie star and did meet her. He was in the tv business himself, so that isn’t unusual.
Because of photos in public, she used that as the basis for her extortion.
How do we know this is probably true? Because she and her lawyers both were silenced by cohen for 130 000 dollars, a paltry sum against a multi billionaire.
Had they had a real case they would have gone for the stars, but they knew asking too much would cause a legal fight. Therefore, they knew they’d lose their extortion bid.
What response from Senator Fetterman’s wisdom?
She says, “illegal scheme.” I’ll wager she can in no way cite legal code.
Well Amanda, you can shove your article where the sun doesn’t shine. I’m positive that’s best you had in a long time. Your opinion doesn’t matter.
If an argument can be made that the payments would have been made to protect a personal or public reputation, regardless of whether Trump was running for President, then they are not illegal.
That is exactly what has been claimed for years.
PS - Stormy Daniels stated herself and through her lawyer in 2018 that the affair with Trump never happened. The media seems to have forgotten that.
What a stretch.
The author would have to have a rubber band for a brain to dream up that scenario.
This is a DJT hit piece.
Why is this on here?
Honestly quoting the Bulwark thought this site was better than quoting a bunch of wanna be Lincoln Project types. Trump should sue
January 30,2018
To Whom It May Concern:
Over the past few weeks I have been asked countless times to comment on reports of an alleged sexual relationship I had with Donald Trump many, many, many years ago.
The fact of the matter is that each party to this alleged affair denied its existence in 2006,
20011,2016,2017 and now again in 2018.1 am not denying this affair because I was paid “hush money” as has been reported in overseas owned tabloids. I am denying this affair because it never happened.
I will have no further comment on this matter, Please feel free to check me out on Instagram at @thestormydaniels.
Stormy Daniels
WHAT A CROCK OF DUNG!
Is there any mention of “statute of limitations” in the article?
How many ‘private lives’ did Billy *Bubba get?
The bullwark? That is where the Never Trump “ conservatives” after the Weekly Standard died
The stupid author of the bulwark - in addition to her wrongheaded arguments - fails to tell her readers that her own arguments are moot. There is a five year statute of limitations on acts that break federal campaign finance laws. Such acts occurring in 2016 ran past that limitation in 2021.
The Hillary Clinton campaign spent over $1 billion “for the principal purpose of influencing the election.”.
Throw the corrupt old sot in jail!!