Kari Lake scores win as Arizona Supreme Court sends part of her lawsuit back to trial court

Just the News ^ | 3/22/23 | Charlotte Hazard

[Regulator]

Well if they don’t order one then a Recall is in order.

AZ ain’t some iron clad Rat thugocracy like Noo Yawk.

Recall them all in the summer. Hobbs, Mayes, Fontes and the air headed Mormon Judge who let all this happen.

Undoubtedly Fontes will try some more Mexican dimbulb tricks to screw with the election but maybe this time the populace will be on to him.

Just keep up the pressure. Never accept these gangsters.

[pepsi_junkie]

Thankfully, we aren't a "Democracy".

The USA is a representative republic. We're talking about an election for governor in Arizona, which is determined democratically, 1 person - 1 vote basis. So it's different than offices at federal level.

Do I pass the test?

[lepton]

5. Did the panel err when it ignored the evidence that Maricopa’s failure to perform L&A testing caused massive disruptions to voting on Election Day disenfranchising thousands of Republican voters, and rejecting evidence that the chaos made the election outcome at least “uncertain” under Findley, 35 Ariz. at 269?

---

That this is not considered, is disappointing.

7. Did the panel err in dismissing the Equal Protection and Due Process claims on the pleadings as “duplicative” of Count II, without considering the additional issues that equal-protection and due-process review add to Maricopa’s misconduct, such as the targeting of Republican voters and the “patent and fundamental unfairness” of targeted election disruptions?

---

As is this.

2. Given the EPM’s requirement that “the number of ballots inside the container shall be counted and noted on the retrieval form” “[w]hen the secure ballot container is opened,” EPM, Chapter 2, §I.7.h.1, did the panel err in holding that the EPM does not “impos[e] any express time requirement” for “when” to count ballots and that “an initial estimate” of ballots is all that the law requires?

---

3. Did the panel err when it ignored the undisputed fact that 35,563 unaccounted for ballots were added to the total number of ballots at a third party processing facility—an amount far exceeding the vote margin between Hobbs and Lake—holding that fact was insufficient to show the election’s outcome was at least “uncertain” under Findley, 35 Ariz. at 269?

---

That this is rejected is appalling.

[lepton]

Does that not specifically exclude a ruling based upon Laches?

[lepton]

Even if she ultimately loses, it de-ligitimizes her crooked opponent. Win/Win.

---

Only if the population both notices, and remembers. Hobbs is still in office, and still listed as the victor. Relatively few are going to dig deeper unless given specific cause.

[Lockbox]

I read the lower court ruling and they used Laches against her. 15 days after election and she “filed too late”. What a court!

[lepton]

Ah. Thanks. The reference was to the lower court ruling, not the ASC.

[Lockbox]

This is towards the Leman’s Garage 56 plan.

[Eleutheria5]

Hobbs will give them specific cause. Hasn’t Brandon? You cheat your way into high office, chances are you can’t do anything right.