Posted on 03/22/2023 8:41:31 PM PDT by CFW
The Arizona Supreme Court ruled Wednesday to send a piece of former GOP gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake's election lawsuit back to trial court to examine whether or not Maricopa County followed signature verification policies in 2022.
The order states: "IT IS FURTHER ORDERED remanding to the trial court to determine whether the claim that Maricopa County failed to comply with A.R.S. § 16-550(A) fails to state a claim pursuant to Ariz. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for reasons other than laches, or, whether Petitioner can prove her claim as alleged pursuant to A.R.S. § 16-672 and establish that 'votes [were] affected "in sufficient numbers to alter the outcome of the election”' based on a 'competent mathematical basis to conclude that the outcome would plausibly have been different, not simply an untethered assertion of uncertainty.'"
(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...
Well if they don’t order one then a Recall is in order.
AZ ain’t some iron clad Rat thugocracy like Noo Yawk.
Recall them all in the summer. Hobbs, Mayes, Fontes and the air headed Mormon Judge who let all this happen.
Undoubtedly Fontes will try some more Mexican dimbulb tricks to screw with the election but maybe this time the populace will be on to him.
Just keep up the pressure. Never accept these gangsters.
The USA is a representative republic. We're talking about an election for governor in Arizona, which is determined democratically, 1 person - 1 vote basis. So it's different than offices at federal level.
Do I pass the test?
5. Did the panel err when it ignored the evidence that Maricopa’s failure to perform L&A testing caused massive disruptions to voting on Election Day disenfranchising thousands of Republican voters, and rejecting evidence that the chaos made the election outcome at least “uncertain” under Findley, 35 Ariz. at 269?
7. Did the panel err in dismissing the Equal Protection and Due Process claims on the pleadings as “duplicative” of Count II, without considering the additional issues that equal-protection and due-process review add to Maricopa’s misconduct, such as the targeting of Republican voters and the “patent and fundamental unfairness” of targeted election disruptions?
2. Given the EPM’s requirement that “the number of ballots inside the container shall be counted and noted on the retrieval form” “[w]hen the secure ballot container is opened,” EPM, Chapter 2, §I.7.h.1, did the panel err in holding that the EPM does not “impos[e] any express time requirement” for “when” to count ballots and that “an initial estimate” of ballots is all that the law requires?
Does that not specifically exclude a ruling based upon Laches?
Even if she ultimately loses, it de-ligitimizes her crooked opponent. Win/Win.
I read the lower court ruling and they used Laches against her. 15 days after election and she “filed too late”. What a court!
Ah. Thanks. The reference was to the lower court ruling, not the ASC.
This is towards the Leman’s Garage 56 plan.
Hobbs will give them specific cause. Hasn’t Brandon? You cheat your way into high office, chances are you can’t do anything right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.