To: Mariner
A lot of Republican’s are mis-interpreting the letter. Cohen did not pay $135k of his own money out of the goodness of his heart; he did it because he expected (and was) reimbursed by Trump. The letter can absolutely be used to prove that Cohen perjured himself, but it doesn’t exonerate Trump.
(The statute of limitations and the ridiculousness of which account the money came from does exonerate Trump)
To: TennesseeProfessor
better read it again prof.
also statute of limitations is iffy in ny
continoous absence
To: TennesseeProfessor; Mariner
A lot of Republican’s are mis-interpreting the letter. Cohen did not pay $135k of his own money out of the goodness of his heart; he did it because he expected (and was) reimbursed by Trump. The letter can absolutely be used to prove that Cohen perjured himself, but it doesn’t exonerate Trump.
Where is the proof that President Trump reimbursed Cohen?
76 posted on
03/22/2023 7:05:54 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: TennesseeProfessor
To: TennesseeProfessor
A lot of Republican’s are mis-interpreting the letter. Cohen did not pay $135k of his own money out of the goodness of his heart; he did it because he expected (and was) reimbursed by Trump. The letter can absolutely be used to prove that Cohen perjured himself, but it doesn’t exonerate Trump. (The statute of limitations and the ridiculousness of which account the money came from does exonerate Trump)
There is nothing to exonerate Trump from perfesser! Any run of the mill highly educated idiot can see that.
92 posted on
03/23/2023 4:52:11 AM PDT by
BlackbirdSST
(Trump or Bust!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson