Posted on 03/12/2023 3:42:45 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
Fox News host Tucker Carlson promised never-before-seen footage of the Jan. 6 riot that would reveal new details and alter public perceptions of the Capitol breach. But in his first shows dedicated to the topic, he largely came up short in delivering smoking guns.
Carlson gained access to some 44,000 hours of the attack by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), a move that was opposed by former members of the Jan. 6 committee and alarmed Capitol Police who said it had remained unaired due to security concerns.
(Excerpt) Read more at offthepress.com ...
It takes a long time to go through that much video. Even if you have a staff of ten people focused on nothing but going through that video, that is still four THOUSAND hours per person. Do you know how many days it would take for you to go through four thousand hours of video?
Maybe the H3ll supporting wifeys of the sons
Wow more HILL propaganda
Tucker shows video of the horned guy being escorted by capital police, and the officer the media claimed died, very much alive later on j6, chuck u/China mitch come out next day with hair on fire, and you guys whine
the memes Tucker would bust were listed by Miranda Devine prior to their airing on Fox.
by concentrating on a few, it should have been easy to keep the focus on just how fake the J6 official narrative was.
instead, whether its FakeMSM, Dems, RINOS, or even some commenting on FR, it’s attack Tucker Carlson!
5 March: New York Post: Why Democrats are dreading a full Jan. 6 reveal
By Miranda Devine
The Fox News host will air five stories culled from the footage Monday and Tuesday nights, countering the overblown “insurrection” narrative the Democrats and their media toadies have been pushing since Day One...
But when you see what Carlson’s team has put together over the past two weeks of combing through thousands of hours of video, you will be struck by how different the reality was inside the building that day compared to the J6 committee’s deceptively edited primetime dramas, produced by a former ABC News president for maximum emotional impact.
For instance, Carlson’s team says the J6 committee added audio to silent CCTV footage, inserting screams and other crowd mayhem sounds, to make it seem more ominous. The bookmarks on the video trove show the J6 committee had access to the same footage yet chose to show America only what suited its divisive narrative...
He will show hundreds of peaceful people inside the Capitol behaving like tourists, queueing politely, walking within the rope lines, taking selfies, and stopping to pick up an overturned bollard, all while police look on.
Most strikingly, you will see for the first time the truth about the so-called QAnon Shaman, Jacob Chansley...
https://nypost.com/2023/03/05/house-speaker-kevin-mccarthy-gives-tucker-carlson-unfettered-footage-of-jan-6-riot/
Articles by Miranda Devine/New York Post
6 March: Footage shows Capitol cop Brian Sicknick uninjured on Jan 6
https://nypost.com/author/miranda-devine/
And what about that Roseann lady that was killed??
“Without it, one must assume it may be incriminating.”
assume it may be incriminating?
Ridiculous. In this country, you are presumed innocent until proven guilty.
What Tucker showed revealed the deceptive narrative of the entire Jan 6 committee, not the guilt or innocence of any particular person.
What was shown was the horned dude was not really trying to overthrow the government, despite what the FBI claims. The police escorting him around were complicit in whatever he did.
I watch his show sporadically, but he has discussed Ashli Babbitt previously. There is a lot to go through, and he has just shy of an hour each weekday night. He also tries to expose Biden’s ChiCom ties among so many other topics. Let’s see how this unfold before griping.
I watch his show sporadically, but he has discussed Ashli Babbitt previously. There is a lot to go through, and he has just shy of an hour each weekday night. He also tries to expose Biden’s ChiCom ties among so many other topics. Let’s see how this unfold before griping.
Yes.
In actuality, just as big is the fact that this footage was withheld from the defense attorneys. People can blather all they want, but that was Brady material, and the government clearly knew what it showed.
You even hear the dorks on here saying “There was 40.000 hours of footage! They couldn’t have watched it all!”
The government damn well surely watched that footage, from inside the Capitol, all of it, within hours of obtaining it.
Yes. See my post above.
But hey. There are many here who ideologically have more in common with editors at The Hill than they do with many on Free Republic and in the non-uniparty membership.
The central committee dictation of History will not be challenged
I may have missed it but I don’t think Carlson published the Shaman video outside the Capital doors telling the crowd to go home. What was with that?
Amen!!!
Maybe Jeb! will toss his hat in the ring again, hoping to get more delegates than Secret Service agents this time.
Wasn’t there bodycam video of the cops killing the lady outside?
Tucker lamented upfront that the Ashli murder was not part of the footage that his crew viewed.
In that same vain, Musk should identify WHO in the FBI, et al we’re working with Twitter to censor and lie.
Saying that Twitter was having meetings with federal agencies says nothing. Twitter execs didn’t meet with the FBI, et al, they met with people that worked for the various entities.
If Musk is truly transparent, those people would be named.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.