Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/08/2023 8:10:43 PM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

p


2 posted on 03/08/2023 8:10:58 PM PST by bitt (<img src=' 'width=50%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
This is what Musk was talking about the other day...

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2023/02/15/elon_musk_tells_world_government_summit_that_global_government_could_lead_to_civilizational_collapse.html

4 posted on 03/08/2023 8:29:22 PM PST by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

In the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and by the authority granted us in His Name in Matthew 16:19, 18:18, and Luke 10:19, we now bind the strongman over all evil spirit powers working in and through the World Health Organization and the person or entity known variously as Joseph Biden, The President of the United States of America, and including any and all CGIs, clones, doubles, doppelgangers, et cetera, et al, and any and every handlers of any type.

We loose onto the strongmen the spirits of confusion, destruction, burning and judgement, and also heavenly warrior angels, to attack and destroy or remove said strongmen. In Jesus’ Name.

We ask that all strongmen be removed and replaced with spirits of Holiness unto the LORD. In Jesus’ Name, amen.


6 posted on 03/08/2023 8:50:45 PM PST by Norski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

The Constitution does that.

Pity Republicans don’t really push compliance with the Constitution.


7 posted on 03/08/2023 8:51:03 PM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

There is already a limit on (alleged) President Joe Biden’s ability to unilaterally negotiate agreements...it’s called the Constitution.


8 posted on 03/09/2023 4:14:09 AM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt; All
Thank you for referencing that article bitt. Please note that the following critique is directed at Sen. Johnson and not at you.

"[...] any agreement that the Biden administration enters into with the World Health Organization will be deemed a treaty [??? emphasis added], [...]"


FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Respectfully to post-17th Amendment ratification Sen. Ron Johnson, why doesn't he point out that the states would first need to appropriately amend the Constitution to give the feds the specific power to dictate, regulate, tax and spend in the name of INTRAstate healthcare (Obamacare unconstitutional imo) before the feds can use treaty power to force US citizens to comply with foreign healthcare laws?

Note that the Supreme Court has not only clarified that the states have never expressly constitutional given the feds the specific power to dictate intrastate healthcare, but has also emphasized constitutional limits on federal treaty powers as follows.

Also consider that Thomas Jefferson had used his uncommon common sense as Secretary of State, then later his experience as president of the Senate, to point out that federal government power to make treaties cannot be used as backdoor to bypass the Constitution's Article V process for giving new powers to the fedreal government (my words).

Patriots, the bottom line is this imo. What is your threshold of “pain” for peacefully stopping unconstitutionally big state and federal governments controlled by bully, constitutionally undefined political parties, from oppressing the people under their boots?

The inevitable remedy for ongoing, post-17A ratification, corrupt political party treason (imo)...

All MAGA patriots need to wake up their RINO federal and state lawmakers by making the following clear to them.

If they don’t publicly support either a resolution, or a Constitutional Convention, to effectively "secede" ALL the states from the unconstitutionally big federal government by amending the Constitution to repeal the 16th (direct taxes) and 17th (popular voting for federal senators) Amendments (16&17A), doing so before the primary elections in 2024, that YOU will primary them.

If the proposed amendment was limited strictly to repealing 16&17A, relatively little or ideally no discussion would be needed before ratification of the amendment imo.

With 16&17A out of the way, my hope is that Trump 47 becomes the FIRST president of a truly constitutionally limited power federal government.

In the meanwhile, I'm not holding my breath for significant MAGA legislation to appear in the first 100 days of new term for what may still prove to be another RINO-controlled House.

Trump will hopefully do another round of primarying RINOs for 2024 elections.

9 posted on 03/09/2023 6:57:23 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson