Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blinken says U.S. has had talks with Elon Musk about Starlink in Ukraine
One America News ^ | February 18, 2023 | Michael Martina and Richard Cowan; Editing by Daniel Wallis (Rooters)

Posted on 02/19/2023 6:12:46 AM PST by Navy Patriot

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Saturday that the U.S. government has had conversations with Elon Musk about the use of Starlink satellite internet in Ukraine.

SpaceX this month said it has taken steps to prevent Ukraine’s military from using the company’s Starlink service for controlling drones in the region during the country’s war with Russia.

(Excerpt) Read more at oann.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Blinken's dilemma: How to threaten Musk without it blowing up in his face?
1 posted on 02/19/2023 6:12:46 AM PST by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

I am sure Musk has already been threatened.


2 posted on 02/19/2023 6:17:27 AM PST by dforest (All of America has derailed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

"I made him an offer ... and he refused."

3 posted on 02/19/2023 6:17:45 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (“You want it one way, but it's the other way”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Blinken vs Musk = Mickey Mouse vs Patton


4 posted on 02/19/2023 6:20:13 AM PST by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Sure, tell me that the US was not the ones who targeted the Russian barracks in Russia? Tell me that Ukraine has the technology to use satellite targeting and UAV’s to fly deep into Russia with precision? It seems Blinken wants to control what is hit in Russia since we are the ones doing this directly. I mean its now pretty much out that we destroyed the gas pipelines in the Baltic sea and we provided the technology that hit the Russian ships.

Another thing I’ll jump on is the US is “Concerned” that China is giving Russia non-military support in the war. What are we doing? Direct military support. We are at war against Russia. All this “fooling around” is fooling only US government and a few dumb Democrat followers. We are only minutes away from a nuclear strike from Russia and the public is acting like nothing is really going on.


5 posted on 02/19/2023 6:25:34 AM PST by realcleanguy (quickly things are falling apart, now that the )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Why don’t they download some child porn on his phone and then throw him in jail, until he complies?


6 posted on 02/19/2023 6:32:14 AM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

“Nice company you’ve got there....”


7 posted on 02/19/2023 6:34:59 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Um ..... you are in tune!

We were highlighting this very entrapment tactic back in 2018.


8 posted on 02/19/2023 6:36:16 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

I hope that Musk doesn’t fall for the trap. If he allows it, then they will own him, which might be the objective anyway.


9 posted on 02/19/2023 6:38:11 AM PST by silent majority rising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

There’s no war declaration to allow asset takeover.

Screw Biden and the wackos who support him and the war in Ukraine.


10 posted on 02/19/2023 6:59:21 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
There’s no war declaration to allow asset takeover.

Since when does the US Government Obey The Law?

11 posted on 02/19/2023 7:12:01 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Celebrate Decivilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy

Everybody knows ... It’s Different When We Do It!


12 posted on 02/19/2023 7:13:33 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Celebrate Decivilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
“Nice company you’ve got there....”

Nowadays it's: "Cute kid you got there" ...

13 posted on 02/19/2023 7:15:27 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Celebrate Decivilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy

I’m genuinely curious just how hard a nuclear strike Russia could actually deliver upon us? I’m becoming more confident that the sh*t shape of their regular forces and munitions means that their nukes and missiles are sh*ttily maintained as well. Why choose to live with Russia run by a nuke threatening tyrant if the opportunity present itself to take that threat out forever? I think hes bluffing and I think the US thinks so too. That’s why we are going to escalate and escalate because they are bluffing about using their nukes. And if they aren’t? Take them out.
Change my mind?


14 posted on 02/19/2023 7:18:04 AM PST by desertsolitaire (Nothing Changes if Nothing Changes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: desertsolitaire

Russian submarines. They can sit in the waters off the coast and hit us within 10 minutes. I do not know the status of the missiles in the subs. It’s easy to be an armchair warrior. But from someone who has been in the military and trained extensively for a war against Russia, the threat of a nuclear devastation is real. The outcome of that is real. To this day we maintain numerous command centers scattered all over the US in the event some are wiped out. And reality is, we poke the bears and badgers of other countries and in a sense are asking for trouble. We have yet to have a SoS that can negotiate with these countries and end the threat.


15 posted on 02/19/2023 7:32:50 AM PST by realcleanguy (quickly things are falling apart, now that the )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: desertsolitaire

Weren’t they the ones flying us to the ISS when NASA didn’t have a way to get us there? I wouldn’t gamble nuclear Armageddon on the state of their ability to launch missiles


16 posted on 02/19/2023 7:36:49 AM PST by VTenigma (Conspiracy theory is the new "spoiler alert")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: silent majority rising
I hope that Musk doesn’t fall for the trap. If he allows it, then they will own him, which might be the objective anyway.

The feds already own Musk, for all practical purposes, as Musk understands better than anybody. To the extent Tesla is, and ever was, viable as an EV manufacturing company, it is only because the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Obama administration chose -- there was no statutory mandate which EPA had to follow -- to design its then-new GHG tailpipe standards in a way that allowed EVs to participate in the GHG "credits" generating element of that program.

To the extent Tesla is "profitable" at all, it is so only because the company is able to sell GHG credits to other OEMs that need them for compliance purposes. Put simply, the feds stood up Tesla from day one, and governmental policy continues to keep the company in business.

Meanwhile, you think Musk would get to play Rocket Boy with Space X absent the feds giving him permission?

Truth is, Elon Musk can't take a leak without government say-so. His carefully crafted image as a "small government libertarian" is ludicrous, in light of that reality. He knows how far he can push, and he knows when he needs to play ball.

17 posted on 02/19/2023 7:52:42 AM PST by DSH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DSH
We are at the point now where all "private" business is only in business with government approval. Welcome to Fascism folks....


18 posted on 02/19/2023 7:54:48 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: desertsolitaire

> I’m genuinely curious just how hard a nuclear strike Russia could actually deliver upon us?

30 or 40 million dead in the US tops! It would be a cakewalk. We would easily “win”.


19 posted on 02/19/2023 8:00:02 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

20 posted on 02/19/2023 8:02:33 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson