Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS to reconsider hearing case alleging Biden, Harris, lawmakers ignored 2020 fraud, broke oaths
justthenews.com ^ | 2/15/2023 | Natalia Mittelstadt

Posted on 02/15/2023 11:57:54 AM PST by bitt

A "rigged election" is equivalent to war since both "put into power" a "victor," argues plaintiff, and therefore allegations of a rigged election must be investigated.

The Supreme Court is set to reconsider whether to hear a lawsuit alleging President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, former Vice President Mike Pence, 291 House members, and 94 senators violated their oaths of office by refusing to investigate evidence of fraud in the 2020 election before certifying Biden as the victor on Jan. 6, 2021, allowing for Biden and Harris to be "fraudulently" inaugurated.

The plaintiff, Raland J. Brunson, seeks the defendants' removal from office for violating their oaths.

After the Supreme Court declined on Jan. 9 to hear Brunson's lawsuit, he filed a petition for reconsideration on Jan. 23. On Feb. 1, the court scheduled the private conference for reconsidering the petition on Friday, when four of the nine justices must vote to grant the case a hearing for it to move forward.

(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2020fraud; biden; dementiajoe; election; electionfraud2020; karenthedefeatist; notgonnahappen; pdjt; scotus; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: 353FMG

“Will they install Trump as the rightful POTUS?”

No, the courts cannot do that. Only Congress has the power to remove a sitting President, and even then the normal rules of succession would apply the Vice President would take over.


41 posted on 02/15/2023 1:29:55 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bitt; All
Thank you for referencing that article bitt.

"SCOTUS to reconsider hearing case alleging Biden, Harris, lawmakers ignored 2020 fraud, broke oaths"


There is no reasonable explanation (imo) for why legislative and judicial branches ignored due process for Section 2 of the 14th Amendment (14A) when J6 lawmakers voted to ignore allegations of electoral vote-counting fraud, Section 2 a penalty for states where vote-counting fraud has occurred, including for electoral votes.

Excerpted from 14A:

Regarding Section 2, consider that the post-Civil War congressional Republicans who drafted Section 2 made it to discourage Southern Democrats (my words) from rigging the ballot boxes that Democrats are now alleged to have done for 2020, 2022 and possibly earlier elections!

"Because slavery (except as punishment for crime) had been abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment, the freed slaves would henceforth be given full weight for purposes of apportionment. This situation was a concern to the Republican leadership of Congress, who worried that it would increase the political power of the former slave states, even as such states continued to deny freed slaves the right to vote." —Apportionment of Representatives

Also, I still accept the possibility that pro-abortion activist Supreme Court justices worked in cahoots with desperate, elite Democrats to reverse scandalous (imo), politically correct Roe v. Wade to send pro-abortion voters running to their mail boxes for pro-abortion Biden.

In fact, if this were a better world, then a bunch of state and federal government actors would minimaly be losing their government offices under Section 3 of 14A for open rebellion against constitutionally enumerated voting integrity protections, Congress's J6 vote for Biden an example of such rebellion imo.

"14th Amendment, Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof [emphases added]. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."
The bottom line is that when it comes to corrupt state and federal governments, US citizens are “fire fighters,” not “fire preventers” imo.
“Cherish, therefore, the spirit of our people, and keep alive their attention. If once they become inattentive to the public affairs, you and I, and Congress and Assemblies, judges and governors, shall all become wolves [emphasis added]. It seems to be the law of our general nature.” - Thomas Jefferson (Letter to Edward Carrington January 16, 1787)

Otherwise stated... patriots, what is your threshold of “pain” for peacefully stopping corrupt, constitutionally undefined political parties from oppressing the people under their boots?

The inevitable remedy for ongoing, post-17A ratification, corrupt political party treason (imo)...

All MAGA patriots need to wake up their Democratic & RINO federal and state lawmakers by making the following clear to them.

If they don’t publicly support either a resolution, or a Constitutional Convention, to effectively "secede" ALL the states from the unconstitutionally big federal government by amending the Constitution to repeal the 16th (direct taxes) and 17th (popular voting for federal senators) Amendments (16&17A), doing so before the primary elections in 2024, that YOU will primary them.

If the proposed amendment was limited strictly to repealing 16&17A, relatively little or ideally no discussion would be needed before ratification of the amendment imo.

With 16&17A out of the way, my hope is that Trump 47 becomes the FIRST president of a truly constitutionally limited power federal government.

In the meanwhile, I'm not holding my breath for significant MAGA legislation to appear in the first 100 days of new term for what may still prove to be another RINO-controlled House.

Trump will hopefully do another round of primarying RINOs for 2024 elections.

42 posted on 02/15/2023 1:30:58 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Bump to a favorable outcome at SCOTUS.

But methinks we are going to have to shoot our way out this time.

Imho.

5.56mm


43 posted on 02/15/2023 1:31:34 PM PST by M Kehoe (Quid Pro Joe and the Ho have got to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

To everyone reading this thread: It doesn’t matter what you think!!
Of course, everyone is encouraged to pray.


44 posted on 02/15/2023 1:35:20 PM PST by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

sadly I agree ;)


45 posted on 02/15/2023 1:37:04 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

“a very powerful domestic covert operation that is so benign...”

This idiot probably has only heard the word “benign” used in reference to cancers so he thinks it’s a very bad thing.


46 posted on 02/15/2023 1:39:17 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: desertsolitaire

I’ve been disappointed for years now. Hope springs eternal. We’ll see. That’s as optimistic as I’ll get.


47 posted on 02/15/2023 1:50:13 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thinden

I assume this case will not be heard. I read some legal minds dissecting it and there were some legal type reasons why, beyond my capacity to grok fully or explain...


48 posted on 02/15/2023 1:53:33 PM PST by little jeremiah (Never worry about anything. Worry never solved any problem or moved any stone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Afraid you’re right, haven’t seen that screed. Must be a recent public school Grad, or maybe dropout.


49 posted on 02/15/2023 1:58:45 PM PST by matthew fuller (Democrats aren't about Socialism or Communism. They are about Ghettoism, genocide and infanticide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; thinden
I assume this case will not be heard

Probably not. Had they changed and/or re-formatted a few things, it may have at least had a chance. I think their hearts are in the right place, and their assertions may be accurate.

But it bothers me that brother Deron Brunson, who supposedly has a bunch of experience in the legal field and helped draft the litigation, appears to be unable to prepare and format a pleading properly.

Guess we'll see what we'll see. I would like to see this case proceed -- at least to be discussed amongst the Justices.

50 posted on 02/15/2023 2:10:13 PM PST by AFB-XYZ (Stand up, or bend over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Motions to reconsider have hardly ever been granted unless the is huge amounts of new evidence. The SCOTUS will look at thus as a political matter; and do nothing even though their oath of office requires them to hear it.


51 posted on 02/15/2023 2:11:23 PM PST by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
“a very powerful domestic covert operation that is so benign...”

This idiot probably has only heard the word “benign” used in reference to cancers so he thinks it’s a very bad thing.

Exactly! It is shame that some people on this site actually believe this self-important dolt.

52 posted on 02/15/2023 2:26:09 PM PST by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

“It is shame that some people on this site actually believe this self-important dolt.”

If you live long enough you realize that almost half the population is below average intelligence, and that applies to the people who tend to agree with you as much as the people who disagree with you.


53 posted on 02/15/2023 2:32:59 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Grasping at straws


54 posted on 02/15/2023 2:33:07 PM PST by newzjunkey (Trump cannot win in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

Re: 13 - Good ‘friggin grief. This is popping up again?

Thus will fail and should.

SCOTUS has none, zero jurisdiction to remove the President or Vice-President from office. Period.

Brunson wants what he claims are unconstitutional acts to be remedied by…. more unconstitutional acts! Genius! Pure genius!

Brunson is a kook.

Will now await the “fraud vitiates everything” canard being posted.


55 posted on 02/15/2023 3:44:51 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

If the charges in the lawsuit are upheld, I don’t think the court would remove Biden and Kamala from office, although they deserve it. In fact, taking into account the court shied away from other lawsuits challenging that election, I think it’s unlikely that anything will happen now.


56 posted on 02/15/2023 4:32:53 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fury

You forgot that there has been an election since the case was filed. The Congress now sitting is not the same Congress. All of the House and one third of the Senate are into new terms.

The relief sought is way outside the courts authority to grant. 9-0 to go into the vertical file.


57 posted on 02/15/2023 4:38:58 PM PST by GreenLanternCorps (Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Ask about franchise opportunities in your area.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
unfortunately they will punt on this issue

They should punt. It's up to state legislatures to ban ballot harvesting. No early voting. Limit absentee ballots for military only.

58 posted on 02/15/2023 4:48:33 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AFB-XYZ; little jeremiah

I thought SCOTUS turned it down afew weeks ago, but have now reconsidered?


59 posted on 02/15/2023 4:48:36 PM PST by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Fury

Or the ever-popular “At least someone’s doing something.”


60 posted on 02/15/2023 4:55:24 PM PST by j.havenfarm (22 years on Free Republic, 12/10/22! more then 6500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson