Skip to comments.The Man Who Broke Out of Auschwitz to Warn the World-Meet the Escape Artist.
Posted on 02/10/2023 7:02:14 AM PST by SJackson
The Escape Artist: The Man Who Broke Out of Auschwitz to Warn the World by Jonathan Freedland was published by Harper in 2022. It is 376 pages and it includes twelve pages of black-and-white photographs and maps, as well as an index, end notes, and a bibliography.
In The Escape Artist, Jonathan Freedland, a British journalist, tells the story of Rudolf Vrba (1924-2006), who, the book claims, was “the first Jew ever known to break out of Auschwitz and make his way to freedom – one of only four who pulled off that near-impossible feat.”
The Escape Artist is one of the very best books I’ve ever read on any topic, and I recommend it without reservation to any reader with a high school or above reading level. The subject matter is, of course, important, but in lesser hands Vrba’s tale would be an overwhelmingly agonizing read. Freedland’s masterful skill performs the minor miracle of crafting a graphic record of the Holocaust that is also a page-turner. Freedland pulls no punches. He informs the reader of the exact nature of the hell the Nazis operated. But Freedland moves quickly, and brings the reader with him on a breathtaking ride. In any case, only a portion of the book takes place in Auschwitz. The rest records Vrba’s childhood, his heroic efforts to alert the world to the Nazi genocide of Jews, and his final days in Canada and the United States.
Freedland is a thriller author as well as a journalist, and Vrba’s story is over-the-top exciting, full of close calls, superhuman feats, matchless courage and not one but three star-crossed romances. Freedland loves Rudi Vrba, a complicated and at times difficult hero. The author’s affection for his protagonist propels the reader forward. The title of the book promises something of a happy ending – we know that Vrba will successfully escape hell and expose to the world the Nazis’ diabolical crimes.
Vrba’s name is not as familiar as that of Anne Frank, Primo Levi, or Elie Wiesel. Freedland guesses that that is because Vrba could never be what the world, or his fellow Jews, wanted in a concentration camp survivor; more on that, below. Freedland writes, “Maybe, through this book, Rudolf Vrba might perform one last act of escape: perhaps he might escape our forgetfulness and be remembered.”
“Rudolf Vrba” was a nomme de guerre underground resisters would eventually assign to the man born Walter Rosenberg. Like many folklore heroes, little Walter Rosenberg was the apple of his mother’s eye. She was a stepmother to her husband’s other children, but for ten years she had tried to have a child of her own. Finally she was blessed with a son. Vrba’s father owned a sawmill in Slovakia. His father died when he was four, and his mother went to work as a saleswoman. Vrba’s grandfather raised him in Orthodox Judaism. Vrba visited a restaurant and sampled pork. When God did not strike him dead, he broke with Jewish faith. On identity papers, rather than identifying as “Jewish,” he identified as “Czechoslovak.”
Czechoslovakia was a new nation that had come into existence after World War I, in 1918. The territory had previously been part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. It was a small, landlocked state in central Europe, with a population of 14.8 million people. Most industry was in the western, Czech part of the country, but much of that industry was controlled by ethnic Germans. Tomas Garrigue Masaryk, Czechoslovakia’s first president, was born to a poor family. His father was a carter and his mother was a cook. Edvard Benes, the second president, was the tenth child of a peasant family.
Slovaks, in the mountainous east, were majority agriculturalists. Slovaks owned a tiny percent of the nation’s industry. Wealthy aristocratic families, often German or Germanized Slavs, owned a disproportionate percentage of the land. Hungarians had suppressed education in Slovakia. “Although in 1937 Slovakia’s population, including its minorities, amounted to 24 percent of the republic’s total, its share of the country’s industrial production was only about 8 percent. The contribution of Slovak agriculture was only slightly more favorable.” Even after the creation of Czechoslovakia, Slovaks felt themselves to be the poor relations of the Czechs.
Jews occupied a middleman minority position. They were often merchants, shopkeepers, and tavern owners, and often differed linguistically and culturally from the surrounding population. They were more likely to be literate, urban, and white collar, and to speak German or Yiddish.
After having been dominated by Germans and Hungarians, some Czechs and Slovaks chose ethno-nationalism as the path to their desired future. Ethno-nationalists were often anti-Semites, as well as being opposed to Gypsies, aka Rom, and Hungarians. Anti-Jewish riots broke out in Czechoslovakia in the interwar period. Even so, Gerta Sidonova, the woman who would become Rudolf Vrba’s first wife, could report that, “Her early years were happy and peaceful. It was in 1939 that things changed, following the Nazi invasion.”
On September 30, 1938, Germany, Italy, France and the United Kingdom signed the Munich Agreement. This agreement took territory away from Czechoslovakia and gave it to Germany. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain called the Munich Agreement “Peace for our time.” The British and French hoped that by appeasing Hitler’s territorial demands in Czechoslovakia, war with Germany could be averted.
Hitler was lying when he said that the land he took from Czechoslovakia was “the last territorial demand I have to make in Europe.” Nazi Germany attacked Poland on September 1, 1939. Paris fell to Nazi Germany on June 14, 1940. The Battle of Britain began in July, 1940. As Churchill put it, “England has been offered a choice between war and shame. She has chosen shame, and will get war.”
Historian William L. Shirer argued in The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich that Nazi Germany could have been defeated in 1938. “Inspecting Czech fortifications, Hitler tells Goebbels, ‘we would have shed a lot of blood,'” reports the International Churchill Society.
After the Munich agreement, a rump portion of Slovakia, after territorial losses to Hungary and Nazi Germany, became the Slovak Republic, a client state of the Third Reich. This was a tiny state of only 2.6 million people. Slovakia had never been an independent state, and, thanks partially to Hungarian suppression and also simply to poverty and Slovakia’s agricultural profile, there was only a small Slovak intelligentsia. Father Jozef Tiso, a Vienna-educated Catholic priest, served as president of the Slovak Republic.
Before the war, Tiso had been active in fighting alcoholism and poverty. He associated those problems with Jewish tavernkeepers and merchants. Tiso’s Slovak Republic persecuted Jews, expelling Jewish students from schools, and confiscating Jewish property and businesses. Slovak gendarmes went so far as to enter Jewish homes and farms and loot them in full view of helpless property owners. The Slovak Republic bragged that it enacted draconian anti-Jewish legislation more extreme than Nazi Germany’s Nuremberg Laws. Jews “were banned from owning cars, radios, or even sports equipment.” And Tiso’s Slovakia collaborated in the Holocaust, actually paying the Third Reich a fee for “resettlement” of Jews who were, in fact, sent to death camps in Poland. The Slovak Republic had a pre-war Jewish population of 88,951; approximately 60,000 were murdered. The 1944 Slovak National Uprising attempted to overthrow Tiso. It was suppressed by Nazis. Tiso was finally executed by hanging in a reconstituted, post-war Czechoslovakia in 1947.
In short, the odds that a Slovak Jew like Rudolf Vrba would survive to age 81 and would someday frolic with his grandchild were slim to none.
Teenage Vrba, in spite of the Slovak Republic’s anti-Semitism, insisted on identifying as a Slovak. He wanted to travel to England to fight with the Czechoslovak army in exile. Instead he was transported to Majdanek, a concentration camp in Nazi-occupied Poland. Freedland describes in graphic detail the horrors of train transports of unsuspecting Jews, packed into cattle cars with no free space, no water, and just one bucket for waste. Similarly graphic descriptions create nightmarish images of concentration camps. This reader will not soon forget the brief description of Nazis torturing and then shooting dead a Slovak rabbi named Eckstein. After Majdanek, Vrba was transported to Auschwitz. From his first sight of the camp, Vrba, who was highly intelligent, began to commit every detail to memory.
Vrba filled various jobs at Auschwitz. He worked construction, on almost no food, surrounded by SS guards whipping him and kicking his fellow Jewish slave laborers to death. IG Farben engineers and managers, well-dressed and looking professional, visited the construction sight and paid no heed to the hideous conditions under which enslaved Jews labored. After a month, out of a hundred workers, Vrba was one of two to survive.
Vrba was reassigned to Kanada, the Auschwitz storehouse of goods stolen from the arriving Jews who were immediately gassed. Nazis ordered their Jewish slaves to find every hidden valuable. Prisoners squeezed toothpaste tubes in search of diamonds. A Jew who tried to keep an apple was immediately flogged to death. “In one month alone, some 824 freight containers were transported by rail from Auschwitz” to Germany. Worn clothing was distributed to Germans through the Winterhilfswerk, or winter relief fund. “Between 1942 and 1944, an estimated six tons of dental gold were deposited in the vaults of the Reichsbank.” Those gold teeth were often ripped from the still foaming mouths of gassing victims.
No one explained to Vrba that Auschwitz-Birkenau was a death camp. He slowly came to that conclusion while working in Kanada. He noted that he was sorting through baby clothes and canes for the elderly and he never saw children or the elderly in the part of the camp he occupied. Slowly but surely he realized that Jews were arriving and, unlike him and other strong young men like him, these newly arrived Jews were not being slowly worked, beaten, and starved to death, but instead were immediately murdered. “The thought did not form immediately. It took time, perhaps because it was too enormous, too at odds with everything Walter had learned, and wanted to believe, about science and progress and civilization.”
Later, Vrba was assigned to the unloading platform. He worked about three hundred transports that carried, in total, three hundred thousand people. Vrba was determined to memorize every detail, hoping someday to report to the world exactly what was transpiring at Auschwitz.
Trains from western Europe brought victims “from Paris or Amsterdam, people raised to expect the best of the civilized Germans” who “were primed to believe that they were at long last in the hands of German officers who would, naturally, ensure that food and drink would be available, that their luggage would be looked after, and that order was about to be restored … SS men, their manners impeccable, might help the sick clamber aboard, offering a helping hand … ‘Good God,’ they might say ‘in what state did these horrible Slovaks transport you? This is inhuman.'”
“A well-dressed Czech mother” said to a German officer, “‘Thank God we’re here.’ She was one of those deportees who believed that the nation of Goethe and Kant would at least bring a measure of sanity to proceedings … The SS man, gloved, his uniform creased in all the right places, gave her his most benign and trustworthy smile … ‘My dear lady. We are civilized people.'”
Freedland describes how Nazis hid the truth of the death camps as long as possible. Even when discussing their actions with fellow Nazis who knew exactly what the Final Solution entailed, they used euphemistic vocabulary. Nazis hid death camps in remote regions in occupied territory. Victims were assured that they were merely being “relocated.” “It is much easier to slaughter lambs than to hunt deer.” Those prisoners, like the Sonderkommando, who handled corpses, and who knew exactly what was going on, were isolated from other prisoners and eventually killed. Prisoners were also hostages to each other. They knew if one escaped or rebelled, other prisoners in the escapee’s block would be tortured and killed. Vrba, though a good worker, was once himself slated for elimination. In one of many random acts that prolonged his life, a nameless Polish prisoner, “in a gesture of generosity that made no rational sense,” removed Vrba’s name from a list of those to be killed.
Vrba witnessed the creation of the Theresienstadter Familienlager, or Theresienstadt family camp, 17,517 Jews from Czechoslovakia who were not immediately murdered. Nazis established this camp in September, 1943, and allowed Jews to live for several months before gassing them. Why? Possibly to fool Red Cross observers. If observers saw Jews living in Auschwitz for several months they might believe that the Final Solution really was all about “relocation,” not mass murder.
SS officers greeted new family camp arrivals. They “could not have been more solicitous, laughing and chatting, handing out fruit to the adults and sweets to the children, tousling the hair of those who held tight to their dolls and teddy bears.” The camp’s Jewish inmates were mass murdered in two actions, one in March and another in July, 1944. There were 1,294 survivors of the family camp, including Otto Dov Kulka, who would go on to become an Israeli scholar of anti-Semitism. He died at 88 in 2021.
Rudolf Vrba was surviving Auschwitz by telling himself that he must eventually serve as a witness. If Jews knew that the trains were taking them to their deaths, not to “relocation,” they would become more difficult to control. That was Vrba’s hope. The family camp “jolted” Vrba. Vrba was assigned by the Auschwitz underground resistance to see how many in the family camp would be willing to revolt. They had nothing to lose. “They could see the chimneys; they could smell the smoke.” “Too many of the Familienlager inmates could not accept that the SS would murder the very children they had played with, whose names they knew … These Jews had the information. The trouble was, they did not believe it.” A potential leader of a revolt, faced with impossible choices, poisoned himself. Alicia, the family camp girl with whom Vrba lost his virginity, took her place on a truck to the gas chamber. “It has been wonderful,” she said.
Vrba’s method of escape was ingenious, courageous, and makes for a breathless read. I’m not going to spoil the details of his epic escape here. After clearing Auschwitz and evading immediate capture, Vrba and his fellow escapee, Alfred “Fred” Wetzler, moved on foot toward Slovakia, the land of their birth. They had to cover fifty miles over increasingly mountainous terrain. Vrba and Wetzler knew that “any Pole found harboring, or even assisting, a Jew would be executed. Conversely, a Pole who found a Jew in hiding and gave them up would be rewarded.”
A peasant woman fed and sheltered the escapees. She warned them that because of local partisan activity, the many Germans in the area might shoot any strangers on sight. The woman knew that “many Poles had already been killed for making the mistake of giving food” to strangers. Why did the Polish peasant woman help? Perhaps because she had had two sons. One was already dead; the other was a prisoner in a concentration camp. When Vrba and Wetzler left, the poor woman insisted on giving the men money, though she seemed to subsist on not much more than potatoes. After they moved on, they noted that locals appeared afraid of them, but would “accidentally drop half a loaf of bread near their path.”
In another encounter, the two immediately identified themselves to a woman herding goats. “We’ve escaped from Auschwitz,” they said, knowing that that information would be enough to get them killed. The woman gestured toward a goat hut where she gave them bread and a blanket. She told them to wait there; later, a boy brought them potatoes and meat. An old man in “shabby clothes … carrying a gun” arrived. The gun frightened the escapees, but the man had merely brought them more food. The goat-herding woman cried as the old man took Vrba and Wetzler to another hideout, where they were able to sleep in real beds, and where their Polish host gave them new shoes.
The Pole further risked his life by guiding Vrba and Wetzler through territory regularly patrolled by Germans. The Pole said that the Germans stuck so closely to their schedules that they were easily evaded through careful timing. Finally, the old man pointed to a forest. “That’s Slovakia,” he said. Vrba asked the old man’s name, but the man wouldn’t give it. Vrba understood. If Nazis captured Vrba, he couldn’t gave away a name he didn’t know. The old man provided Vrba with an address in Slovakia. He instructed Vrba to tell the people at the address that “the living hillsman from Milowka” had sent them. The old man teared up as he sent Vrba and Wetzler on their way.
Once they arrived in Slovakia, using the old Pole’s nomme de guerre, Vrba and Wetzler were again helped by a local, who, again, living under a Nazi client state, was risking his own life by offering that help. This man gave the escapees peasant garb and assigned them to tending to his pigs. That way they would avoid detection.
For me, reading of these kindnesses was a whiplash experience after pages of brutality. I soldiered through the Auschwitz descriptions, stone-faced. When I read of the humanity exhibited by these nameless peasant heroes, I cried.
Vrba and Wetzler prepared a meticulous report documenting the Final Solution as it was being carried out in Auschwitz. The Escape Artist describes the many good people, Jewish and non-Jewish, in Nazi-occupied territory and in free lands, who worked hard to get the report in front of as many eyes as possible, from Jewish civilians in Hungary to world leaders. For example, Dr. Geza Soos, a Calvinist anti-Nazi resister, worked on distributing the report in Hungary.
Unfortunately, too many others wanted nothing to do with the realities exposed in the Vrba-Wetzler report. They buried it, slow-walked it through bureaucratic channels, or refused to believe it. World leaders, Freeman suggests, refused to take actions they could have taken to address the ongoing Holocaust. Perhaps most pertinently, Jews and others living under Nazi occupation had limited power to act.
American and British leaders believed that defeating Nazi Germany militarily should be their sole focus. Various government officials and press organs decided that putting too much emphasis on Jews might alienate the public. “Yank, a US Army journal” even after requesting details about Nazi war crimes, “declined to use the copy of the Auschwitz report … Yank found it ‘too Semitic’ and requested a ‘less Jewish’ account.” Some in American and British administrations wrote the report off as what they perceived as Jewish exaggeration of persecution. One member of the British Foreign Office wrote, “In my opinion, a disproportionate amount of the time of the office is wasted on dealing with these wailing Jews.” One Jew who read the report “seemed incredulous that ‘civilized Germany’ was executing people without due legal process.” Vrba was profoundly disappointed in what he assessed as his fellow Jews’ hesitancy and inaction. His attitude would contribute to his being persona non grata to various Jewish organizations in the years to come.
Some Jewish leaders begged the Allies to bomb the rail lines leading to Auschwitz. “The War Department did not undertake a study of whether bombing the railway lines was militarily feasible; no one looked for alternative means of halting, or even slowing, the transports … US reconnaissance planes flew over Auschwitz taking aerial photographs often in the spring and summer of 1944 … the images were detailed and revealing. They showed everything the Vrba Wetzler report described … No one ever examined those pictures.”
In Hungary, Rezso Kasztner, a Jewish leader, privately offered Adolf Eichmann a bribe to allow 1,684 Jews to escape. Freedman writes, “the Jewish rescue committee handed over $1,000 per head for every passenger on the Kasztner train, a total of $1,684,000 …and, more precious still, a Jewish community that would be sufficiently pliant and passive to enable the deportations to proceed smoothly … The Nazis wanted Kasztner’s silence. And they got it. Kasztner kept the Vrba-Wetzler Report to himself and the small leadership circle around him.” Kasztner did, though, “order the distribution of the notorious postcards which purported to offer greetings from those who had been ‘resettled’ in new homes.”
One can only imagine how crushed Vrba felt. He survived Auschwitz by telling himself that he would expose Nazi crimes to the world, and that doing so would save lives. It didn’t work out that way, but Vrba’s astounding resiliency would not allow him to sit back and wallow in despair. He joined the Slovak resistance, fought in at least nine battles against SS units and many raids against German artillery posts, and lived to relish the sounds of SS men’s death throes. After the war, Vrba was awarded the Czechoslovak Medal for Bravery, the Order of the Slovak National Insurrection, and the Medal of Honor of Czechoslovak Partisans.
Vrba reconnected with Gerta Sidinova, a girl he had known before the war, and they married. Because Vrba was a former partisan, he was able to receive an enviable apartment in the new, communist Czechoslovakia. The couple had two children, Helena and Zuza. Rudi and Gerta resumed their educations interrupted by war. He would get a PhD, and she an MD; both would become published scientists.
But all was not well. Rudi was a difficult husband. He was suspicious, verbally abusive, and given to drinking alone. He had multiple affairs. Some liaisons were conducted on the living room couch in the apartment he shared with his wife and daughters. Vrba even denounced his wife to the SNB, the Czech secret intelligence service.
Vrba became disillusioned by communist Czechoslovakia. He was followed. He would return home to find that unseen agents had interfered with objects in his home, a common communist tactic to unnerve victims. A professor, he was asked to remove “bourgeois” students from his classes. He was forced to resign when he refused to cooperate fully. He had a PhD, but had to take a night shift job on a technician’s salary. In 1952, Rudolf Slansky, a leading Czech communist, and fourteen other leading communists were subjected to a Stalinist show trial. Eleven, including Slansky, were hanged.
Vrba noticed that no one in the new Czechoslovakia wanted to talk about the Holocaust. Rather, the official line focused on the suffering of communists under Nazism. Vrba realized he had to escape again. Independently of Rudi, Gerta had made the same decision. They both, separately, escaped on the same day. She took a circuitous route to England.
Rudi went to Israel. He didn’t like the “clannishness.” He didn’t like the “romance of a perennially persecuted nation at last capable of defending itself. As far as he was concerned he had already defended himself.” Also, he still assessed Jewish leaders as having failed their own people. He didn’t want to be around Israeli survivors of Europe’s Jewish leadership.
Vrba joined his ex-wife and daughters in England. There, again, Vrba’s “paranoia” irked Gerta. She went to court and won total legal custody of their daughters. Vrba alienated his employers. He moved to Vancouver, where he became a professor of pharmacology. When he was almost fifty, he met a beautiful 24-year-old, Robin, whom he married. He began to “mellow,” but he still had a bad temper, and he was given to assessing strangers as to whether or not they could survive a concentration camp. He convinced his young wife never to have children, because, he said, having children makes you weak.
Decades after the war, people finally began to talk about the Holocaust. Vrba appeared on Claude Lanzmann’s Shoah, but he never became a household name. “He would not serve up a morally comfortable narrative in which the only villains were the Nazis.” Vrba still blamed various Jews. “Handing a platform to Rudolf Vrba” came “to seem like a risk.” “Israel’s preeminent scholars … played a part in preventing him from entering the pantheon of revered survivors.”
Too, Vrba didn’t look like a victim. He had been a mere teen in Auschwitz and he still had a full head of dark hair. He was “tanned, fit, and vigorous … loud and confident … dapper in a leather coat and fedora, a feather in its band … He deploys sardonic, sarcastic humor … he would offer no uplifting aphorisms, reassuring his audience that, ultimately, human beings were good.”
In 1982, Dr. Helena Vrbova, just short of thirty years old, while researching malaria in New Guinea, died. She was in the midst of an unhappy relationship with a married man. Vrba said that losing his daughter to a suspected suicide was the worst event in his life, because he could not fight back. Vrba suddenly began speaking of God, a God he had rejected in his youth.
Vrba faced another shock in his old age. He discovered that the report he and Fred Wetzler had prepared was not the outside world’s first inkling of the Holocaust. Before Vrba and Wetzler, Polish resistance fighters Jan Karski, Stanislaw Jaster, and Witold Pilecki, at immense risk and with much suffering, had conveyed messages to the Allies. The Polish government in exile published “The Mass Extermination of Jews in German-occupied Poland,” a December, 1942, address to the United Nations.
In other words, the major premise of the book, that Rudolf Vrba, nee Walter Rosenberg, escaped from Auschwitz to warn the world, and save the lives of Jews, or at least turn them into “deer” Nazis would have to “hunt” rather than “sheep” they could systematically slaughter, is not accurate. Others had warned the world before Vrba. That makes this astounding life, which Freedland follows in vivid, compelling prose right up to his death at age 81 from bladder cancer, no less fascinating and, indeed, awe-inspiring.
Worth mentioning that Jan Karski, a Polish soldier working undercover at the direction of the Polish government in London began warning the Polish, British and US governments of the murder of Jews as early as 1940. After being withdrawn he met with numerous officials of those governments, including FDR in 1943. FDR had no questions for Karski.
Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt knew from the beginning what was being done to the Jews. They refused to act. They even refused to include what they knew of the genocide in propaganda against the Axis. They at the least could have announced that those that did the killing would be hunted down and punished. Nor would they bomb the rail lines that brought people to these execution camps.
If you ask me who my greatest hero is, without hesitation I will say "Witold Pilecki".
And for what he did, he was murdered by the Communists.
That is what communists do.
Without getting into a discussion of the desirability of bombing the rail lines or camps, that tactic was first brought up by the Polish government in exile. Of course it was their citizens, Jews and Christians, who were being killed. As to propaganda, yes, it should have been used.
> Some Jewish leaders begged the Allies to bomb the rail lines leading to Auschwitz. <
There was a whiff of antisemitism in FDR’s government. But all fairness, I must mention two points.
1. Precision bombing was in its infancy in WW II. How many of those bombs would have hit their target? Maybe 10% on a good day.
2. The Germans were VERY good at repairing damaged railroad lines. Repairing damaged oil refineries and ball-bearing factories, well that wasn’t so easy.
So where do you send the limited amount of bombers you have? Hitting which targets would end the war quickest, and save the most lives? I dunno. It’s not the easiest of calls.
Don't kid yourself, there was a whiff of antisemitism in EVERY government at that time.
You might note my post 7. The bombing idea was first raised by the Polish government who knew of the conditions first. And some Jewish leaders in the US once the knew. There are some comments from Karski that most outside of his government didn’t want to hear about what was going on. Including some prominent Jews in the US and the administration. I don’t have a strong opinion either way. Winning the war was the objective. As a secondary target, maybe. Arming the soviets probably saved more Jewish lives.
i had some correspondence with Rudolf Vrba a few years before his passing, a real credit to the human race...
Me too. Looks like an exceptional history and story that is long overdue to be told.
What would that have accomplished? The Germans were conducting mass killings of Jews before they built their first death camp in Poland. At Chelmno, they killed over 300,000 Jews, between 1941-45, by using gas vans - the rail lines didn't even reach Chelmno.
The Allies were committed to total war with Nazi Germany, to end the killing of innocents as quickly as possible. The Nazis, on the other hand, were committed to wiping out the Jews, and diverted essential resources from their war effort to that end, even when the war was obviously lost. Bombing rail lines to concentration camps wouldn't have saved any Jews, or stopped the Nazis. The Germans would have unloaded the stopped trains, machine gunned the prisoners and then gone back to kill more.
‘The Escape Artist’
Keep an eye out for it.
I will read that. I have always been interested in pre-war Germany, and the events that transpired, the people who did them and why, so this book will be read and placed in my collection.
Thank you for posting this most interesting article.
If you’re interested, you should find a copy of the 2021 film, The Aushwitz Report, a dramatization of the escape of Rudolf Vrba and Alfréd Wetzler.
In the end their escape came to nothing because the information didn’t make it to Allies’ Supreme Command until early 1944, the the brass thought mounting any effort to free them would directly reduce resources they thought better spent on D-Day.
Not to mention most of the Jews were to be found east of Berlin, so that’s where they built the camps, too far from English airbases to be targeted practically.
You might also be interested in another 2021 film, “Getting Away with Murder(s)”, which details how few of the hundreds of thousands of Nazis directly involved in the mass murder program ever were brought to justice, to include some still living but protected by their host nation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.