Child Vaccination Rates, Already Down Because of COVID, Fall Again

Pew Stateline ^ | January 12, 2023 | Christine Vestal

[DoodleBob]

Let's take a trip down memory lane. Notice the ramp-up after 1980.

TABLE 1. Year of U.S. licensure of selected childhood vaccines

Vaccine Year of first US licensure
Tetanus toxoid 1943
Trivalent inactivated influenza 1945
Tetanus and diphtheria toxoids 1953 for children aged >7 yrs; 1970 for children aged <7 yrs
Inactivated polio 1955
Oral polio 1963
Diphtheria--tetanus--pertussis 1970
Diphtheria--tetanus--acellular pertussis 1991
Measles--mumps--rubella 1963 (measles); 1967 (mumps); 1969 (rubella); 1971 (measles--mumps--rubella combined)
Hepatitis B 1981 (plasma derived); 1986 (recombinant)
Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate 1987 for children aged ≥18 mos; 1990 for infants
Hepatitis A 1995
Varicella 1995
Pneumococcal conjugate 2000 (7-valent); 2010 (13-valent)
Live attenuated influenza 2003
Tetanus--diphtheria--acellular pertussis 2005
Meningococcal conjugate 2005
Rotavirus 2006
Human papillomavirus 2006

-------------------------------------------------------

And here's where they are in LA County:

How'd we get here? Per the article from which the table originated -

In April 1977, a Childhood Immunization Initiative was announced with two goals: attainment of immunization levels of 90% in the nation's children by October 1979 and establishment of a permanent system to provide comprehensive immunization services to the 3 million children born each year in the United States. Increased funding was provided through Section 317, and a major effort was made to review vaccination records of school children and vaccinate those in need. State and local public health personnel reviewed >28 million records during a 2-year period. In addition, state and local authorities enacted and enforced school immunization requirements. By 1980, all 50 states had such laws, and since 1981, immunization levels of students entering schools have been ≥95%. Thus, the first target of the initiative was met.(emphasis added) Achieving the second target would take considerably longer.

I'm all for health care that...well...cares for health. I'm also for the rights of the individual, am against force and fraud, and for plenary parental rights.

The issue isn't whether injecting all of those elixirs into young bodies is right, wrong, efficacious, or poisonous. However, let's HAVE that discussion. I mean...what do the vaccinated have to fear?

The issue is the rights of PARENTS vs the State. If you oppose progressive educational nonsense and indoctrination, then you MUST oppose mandatory vaccinations for public school.

[ConservativeInPA]

This article is pure propaganda. It’s a great thing that parents are not subjecting their children to experimental gene therapies. There is hope for the continuation of mankind, assuming boys stop feeling like they are girls.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Most vaccines are unnecessary.
The US is way overboard on sheer number.

[mewzilla]

If parents read this, they might fall even further...

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

From the conclusion...

...Our study is the first in vitro study on the effect of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 on human liver cell line. We present evidence on fast entry of BNT162b2 into the cells and subsequent intracellular reverse transcription of BNT162b2 mRNA into DNA.

[mewzilla]

Integrated into the host genome...

Holy ****.

[Jane Long]

Integrated into the host genome...

---

Wait a darn minute.....we REPEATEDLY heard the $hot $hills/FRoctors say that these $hots were extremely safe, effective...and, would not change/alter/integrate into the recipients genome.

[DSH]

Our study is the first in vitro study on the effect of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 on human liver cell line. We present evidence on fast entry of BNT162b2 into the cells and subsequent intracellular reverse transcription of BNT162b2 mRNA into DNA.

Yes. Potentially the "worst case scenario." Predicted by some as far back as 2020.

[mewzilla]

Now we know why they chose not do the genotoxicity studies.

Or, if they did, why they didn’t make the results public.

[mewzilla]

Related...

mRNA Vaccines: Why Is the Biology of Retroposition Ignored?

[Jane Long]

And....wanted their evil study results kept under lock and key....for 75 years.

[Jane Long]

Ping to posts 4 and 5.

[grey_whiskers]

[DSH]

Related...

mRNA Vaccines: Why Is the Biology of Retroposition Ignored?

Interesting. Thanks for passing this along.

My working assumption for a while now is that the entire mRNA "platform," be it for vaccines (for which, of course, it was not originally developed) or for any other form of focused pharmaceutical treatment, doesn't work. It just doesn't. It's garbage, and quite dangerous garbage at that.

In other words, the mRNA platform is one of those things that looked good on paper -- or, rather, on a computer screen -- but which doesn't actually work in real life. It turned out to be sh*t, that' all. Hey, it happens. Lot of R&D fails in real life.

Problem is, it's a technology that, at this point, is "too big to fail." A lot of people have invested enormous amounts of money, real bet-the-company sums, on the mRNA approach actually working out. And they'd already started counting their expected mega-profits.

These people, being dug-in, would be perfectly happy to kill and maim millions and millions in pursuit of those imagined mega-profits. And they will never, ever stop. They'll have to be stopped.

[momincombatboots]

85 percent of the country blindly obeyed. That is a holocaust level of unquestionable obedience.
Do you think those kinds of people care about science.
Now they have a mandate to gendermander, mutilate and chemically castrate teens without parental consent.

[Clay Moore]

Shockingly, we will also see a drop in Autism. Pure coincidence.

[13foxtrot]

In other words, the mRNA platform is one of those things that looked good on paper -- or, rather, on a computer screen -- but which doesn't actually work in real life. It turned out to be sh*t, that' all. Hey, it happens. Lot of R&D fails in real life.

There are several other issues that may represent evidence of platform breakdown, such as: lipid nano-particles readily breaching blood brain barriers; or significant immune response to LNPs (absent payload).

Great insight. Platform failure -- that's what they are afraid of.

Back in 2018 Fauci was lamenting that they couldn't get mRNA therapies approved -- he joked that we need a pandemic to get them approved and accepted by the public. They were just itching to bring the mRNA platform to market. New treatments for old ailments all under fresh Patents.

Too bad it doesn't work.

[Jane Long]

Not me ;-)

[Paleo Conservative]

My almost 3 year old son was born just before the COVID-19 lockdowns started. He is fully vaccinated on schedule for all the vaccines listed on the CDC childhood vaccination list as it existed when he was born. He has not been vaccinated against COVID-19, but all other family members have been vaccinated against it with various vaccines available in their countries. My wife and I plan to wait til his next scheduled doctor’s appointment to discuss the issue with our son’s pediatrician.

[mewzilla]

BTTT.

[mewzilla]

From late last year...

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and Adverse Effects in Gynecology and Obstetrics: The First Italian Retrospective Study

...Symptoms such as delayed menstruation and abnormal uterine bleeding (metrorrhagia, menometrorrhagia, and menorrhagia) were generally reported within the first three weeks of vaccination, especially after the second dose, with a percentage of 23% and 77%, respectively. These preliminary data suggest that this problem may be broader and deserving of further investigation in the future...

Love that last sentence.