Posted on 01/27/2023 8:28:10 PM PST by SeekAndFind
The Minnesota House passed legislation after seven hours of debate late Thursday night that would require the state’s electricity grid to be 100% carbon-free in 17 years.
This is an unrealistic timeline that could endanger the lives of Minnesotans if it fails while causing their electricity bills to skyrocket, Republicans argued throughout the night.
They unsuccessfully offered several amendments to the bill, including lifting the state’s moratorium on new nuclear power plants, allowing for the use of carbon sequestration technologies, and delaying the standard to consider its impact on child and slave labor in the green energy supply chain.
Rep. Kaela Berg says it is “offensive” to her “black and brown colleagues” to discuss the use of child and slave labor in the green energy industry. pic.twitter.com/x1wZK6twuV
— Alpha News (@AlphaNewsMN) January 27, 2023
“Frankly, what this bill will be doing today is making Minnesota reliant on nations around the globe that have no labor standards and no environmental standards. Minnesota in this bill will build a clean grid economy on the backs of child slaves in China and poor environmental regulations in Indonesia and the Congo,” Rep. Spencer Igo, R-Wabana Township, said at a press conference ahead of the debate.
He said the resources to build a clean energy future are right in Minnesota’s backyard, yet the federal government has now banned mining on 250,000 acres of the Iron Range.
“The third-largest deposits of copper, nickel and cobalt that exist in the known world are only 250 miles north of this Capitol. Instead of investing in those resources … we have decided to export it around the world where carbon emissions will be 20, 25, or 30 times higher than if we were to do it here in Minnesota,” he continued.
They also expressed concern with the fact that the bill was only heard in one committee before moving to the floor.
Republicans have nicknamed the legislation the “blackout bill,” arguing that using wind and solar alone is unreliable.
“We want to make sure that in Minnesota we are never in a situation where we are having rolling blackouts because here in Minnesota that creates unsafe and dangerous environments,” said Rep. Anne Neu Brindley, R-North Branch, who noted that it took 29 years to reach roughly 20% carbon-free energy in Minnesota.
“In the next 17 years, we have to get to 100%, and we’re not going to do it with nuclear. We’re not really going to do it with hydro. We’re not going to do it with natural gas, we’re not going to do it with clean coal, we’re not going to do it with carbon capture,” she said. “We’re going to do this with wind and solar.”
House Majority Leader Jamie Long, DFL-Minneapolis, lead author of the bill, said addressing climate change is a top concern of Minnesota voters.
“Minnesotans are demanding we take action on climate change,” he said during a press conference. “In my lifetime, the average January low temperature in Minnesota has warmed by nine degrees. These changes are having real impacts, they’re having impacts on our way of life.”
“We also know that it’s having more serious impacts like the severe rain events that we are seeing with increasing frequency on our farms and in our communities and infrastructure,” he said.
Long claimed his bill provides flexibility for utilities and is “technology neutral,” though Republicans disagreed with that claim.
The bill passed in a vote of 70-60 and will now head to the Minnesota Senate.
Good grief! She looks like a complete mental case.
MN should pick a county that goes “carbon free” tomorrow, not in 17 years. It will serve as a pilot project to demonstrate the joys of Marxism.
Solar panels and solar energy is a waste of time in Minnesota. It it works anywhere, it is in sunny states like Florida. Just pave over the Everglades with solar panels/
Unless these “visionaries” plan on going nuclear, this is an impossible task, BUT HELP MAY BE ON THE WAY.
Or at least after they have gotten over their silly superstitions stirred up by that piece of cinematic propaganda, “The China Syndrome”.
For further information:
https://www.neimagazine.com/news/newswestinghouse-promotes-its-smr-in-canada-and-usa-9722957
Good luck
This is a good start, but they will also need to repeal the Law of Gravity and Thermodynamics’ Second Law in order to make it happen.
They’ll be forced to do what California had to do when the state had rolling blackouts under Gov. Grey Davis: They’ll pay out their nose for power from their neighbors.
They’ll eliminate carbon by chasing everyone out except the imported poor in Minneapolis, who won’t be buying cars anyway.
You go for it, Minnesota. Let us know how it works out for you.
What’s the plan? How do they plan on reducing carbon? How do they plan on building using green materials? How do they plan on shipping those materials into the city? How do they plan on converting all the gas stations to electric charging stations? How do they plan on creating the extra electricity to support that? How do they plan on shoveling all the snow with electric snow plows?
Without the feasibility study, business case, return on investment, risk mitigation plan and what the final costs will be, it is just a pipedream meant to siphon money from the citizens.
They’re just laws.
We can repeal them and write new ones!
Add it to 2023, see what you get.
That’s like saying, “We’re going to meet our water needs by going outside and opening our mouths when it rains.”
They have no plan. They won’t even allow mining for cobalt, which Minnesota has plenty of. To show how insane the left’s energy policies are: think about how their “green” energy depends a lot on rare-earths and how they won’t allow mining of the rare-earths available in the U.S.
Good then can all freeze
So the expression now becomes.....Let the Swedes freeze, in the dark!
Then there is nuclear, carbon free, electric power generation.
I suspect that at the proper moment, Elon Musk will announce the existence of small nuclear generators that will become the de facto electric power generation source
Elon now employs somewhere in America the brains and manufacturing capability to produce the revolutionary nuclear generators
"100% clean energy" would be a lie even if China, India, etc. did not exist. At least at the present time, it takes fossil fuels to produce electricity.
Republicans CAN NOT agree on the time of day.....somehow they think they are Right, I guess. How ever only a FOOL vote themselves out of the majority.I agree with bob434, why would a republican want to keep her on any committee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.